• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Learning in a New Land: Immigrant Students in American Society

March 2010 — Volume 13, Number 4

Learning in a New Land: Immigrant Students in American Society

Authors: Carola Suárez-Orozco, Marcelo M. Suárez-Orozco, & Irina Todorova (2008)
Publisher: Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
Pages ISBN Price
Pp. 1 + 426 978-0-674-02675-9 (hardcover) $29.95 U.S.

Dr. Carola Suárez-Orozco is a Professor of Applied Psychology at New York University (NYU), where she also serves as Co-Director for Immigration Studies. Dr. Marcelo M. Suárez-Orozco is the Courtney Sale Ross University Professor of Globalization and Education at New York University, as well as Co-Director of NYU’s Institute for Globalization and Education in Metropolitan Settings (IGEMS), and Co-Director of Immigration Studies. Dr. Irina Todorova is a Professor of Russian and Eurasian Studies at Harvard University, is Director of the Health Psychology Research Center, and also serves as President of the European Health Psychology Society.

Learning in a New Land: Immigrant Students in American Society investigates the development pathways of first-generation immigrant students using the Longitudinal Immigrant Student Adaptation Study (LISA). A focus on Central American, Chinese, Dominican, Haitian, and Mexican students represents the origins of most new-arrivals in the United States. However, authors are cautious to not become complacent with generalizations regarding achievement trends by country of origin or gender and instead focus on the networks of support in which each immigrant student operates, giving weight to methods of identity construction, meaningful relationships, and issues of inner-family communications. The duration of the study (five years) allows for these topics to be explored, in relationship to academic achievement, as dynamic journeys rather than as a static grid of factors and stakeholders. Findings are delineated through five school-performance profiles which emerged during the course of the study: low achievers, slow decliners, precipitous decliners, improvers, and high achievers. Contextualized vignettes of specific students within each profile type permit a complex discussion of qualitative and quantitative data as it pertains to the student’s academic achievement.

The authors conclude that first-generation immigrant students who are able to “float between” identities (p. 307), as opposed to complying to a single, fixed identity or to a hybrid of multiple identities at a single point in time, are more likely to be classified as high achievers. These students, along with improvers demonstrate skills of negotiation between the multiple layers of the immigrant schooling experience. When networks of support were fractured or remained stagnant and unsophisticated, first-generation immigrant students were likely to fall into an achievement profile of precipitous decliners, slow decliners, or consistently low achievers. One of the differences between these three latter profiles is the level of tension between students and parents which often rifts along lines of communication styles, frequency, and depth. Low achievers were seldom received into a highly supportive, multi-layered networks where both students and parents spoke a common dominant language over the five year-span, and decliners often began with positive foundations and attitudes, but found it difficult to sustain as quality relationships waned and networks became misaligned.

It becomes clear that the academic achievement of a first-generation immigrant student is highly dependent of his/her ability to negotiate different spaces and operate with a sustained degree of agency. One of the ways Suárez-Orozco, Suárez-Orozco, and Todorova saw such agency created and maintained was through culturally responsive pedagogy within the classroom, viable language policies, alignment of support networks both in and out of the school building, and the propensity toward hyphenated-identities.

Space emerges as a central theme in the book. Specifically, it attends to how a first-generation immigrant student travels within this space that is arguably highly influential in predicting academic achievement. The student who is able to resist total submersion at a loss of home-culture identification and sustain agency in the face of an objectifying hybridity, is often found among the high achieving. The work of Carter (2005) lends additional insight into the role of the school in creating what she terms, multicultural navigators. Like Suárez-Orozco, Suárez-Orozco, and Todorova, Carter (2005) finds that multilayered networks of support that validate a student’s multiple identities provides the most hospitable space for sustained growth and achievement. However, where Carter (2005) focuses on race and ethnicity, Suárez-Orozco, et al (2008) go a step further with regard to language acquisition, the role of language on identity construction, and the added complications of language policy. An aligned network, where the goal for student achievement is maintained in terms of support for immigrant students, can be further understood in light of the research of Monahan (2005) who finds that it is not only physical space, but also technological and political space that can either create or destroy barriers to personal agency and the alignment of educational goals. This complicates prescription, but also protects from oversimplification and exclusionary practices for English language learners.

In terms of English language learners, such dialogue takes on additional complexity. The higher achieving students in Learning in a New Land (2008) are able to transcend such barriers, often due to conscious dispositions of teachers, mindful language policy, and what Delpit (1995) and Ladson-Billings (1994) refer to as culturally responsive curriculum and instruction. What is clear is that the success of any student, but in particular a first-generation immigrant student, is highly depended upon the space in which they live, work, play, and study. Suárez-Orozco, Suárez-Orozco, and Todorova (2008) lend invaluable expertise and discussion into this contentious space with complex discussion and insight on how to positively influence the academic journey of this important group of students in the United States.

This text is highly recommended for all public school teachers, administrators, and teacher educators. Education policy makers should move this book to the top of their reading list, for policy that neglects the needs of first-generation immigrant students neglects the future of this nation.

References

Carter, P.L. (2005). Keepin’ it real: School success beyond black and white. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Delpit, L. (1995). Other peoples’ children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New Press.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Monahan, T. (2005). Globalization, technological change, and public education. New York: Routledge.

Suárez-Orozco, C., Suárez-Orozco, M.M., & I. Todorova. (2008). Learning in a new land: Immigrant students in American society. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.


Beth Salyers
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
bsalyersuncc.edu

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.