• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

4000 Essential English Words

June 2010 – Volume 14, Number 1

4000 Essential English Words

Author: Paul Nation (2009)  
Publisher: Seoul: Compass Publishing
Pages ISBN Price
Pp. x + 196 978-1-59966-404-0 $20.00 U.S.

Paul Nation, one of the most foremost and prolific authorities on vocabulary learning research, has designed a six-level self-study textbook series for high-beginner to advanced students with the aim of acquiring the most useful American English vocabulary words. Each book in 4000 Essential English Words contains and highlights 600 words, with additional words appearing in the appendix of the first three texts.

However, with the title 4000 Essential English Words emblazoned on the cover of each book, consumers might be forgiven for thinking that each book will cover 4000 words, when, in fact, only 600 words are featured. However, nothing on the book jacket directly dispels this potential misunderstanding.

Overall, the layout throughout the series is bright, clear and engaging, and employs an attractive blend of color photos and illustrations. The series roughly follows the same format. Each book is divided into 30 units, with each 6-page unit targeting 20 thematically unrelated words. This is clearly deliberate and in line with earlier research findings by Nation himself, which argue that studying semantically-related words together makes learning more difficult and inefficient (Nation, 2000). Each of the 30 units opens with an alphabetical set of 20 words, ten to a page, along with its phonetic transcription, part of speech, a simple English definition, and an example sentence. Small color illustrations help to depict each target word’s meaning. This word-image pairings seem particularly effective at helping learners visualize concrete words, such as flashlight and wizard; yet, many illustrations struggle to adequately represent more abstract items such as arduous and presume.

The word list is immediately followed by two pages of useful and enjoyable vocabulary exercises which first check the learner’s receptive then productive knowledge of the target words. Oddly though, no answer key is included, and users will need to visit the publisher’s website to locate one (http://www.compasspub.com/english/).

Each unit concludes with an original short story, which meaningfully contextualizes, with surprising naturalness, the 20 target words presented earlier in the unit. Original stories of this kind are a rare find in standard self-study vocabulary texts, making them a pleasant and pedagogically welcome addition here. However, with titles such as ‘Why Monkey Has No Home’ and ‘The Ice Cream Cone Explosion’, the stories cautiously steer clear of controversy and, at times, seem written with children in mind. As a result, some readers, particularly adults, may find the stories to be somewhat bland and innocuous. Each story is followed by reading comprehension exercises with target vocabulary embedded directly into the exercises themselves for further reinforcement.

An appendix of additional words grouped lexically (e.g., animals, plants, food) appear at the end of books 1, 2, and 3. An alphabetical word index also appears at the end of every book. Unfortunately, one feature not included is a periodic review section or end-of-the-book test.

The biggest selling point of this series is that the 4000 words that permeate the six texts are essential for learners. How does Nation defend this core assertion? The introduction notes that each target word is highly frequent and useful since the items appear with frequency across a range of English language course books of varying levels. This is a chilling admission, since words which appear frequently in course books may not actually occur with equal frequency in reality. Course book writers have long taken a pragmatic approach to vocabulary specification by relying on intuition, experience and common sense (Cunningsworth, 1995). But without some form of empirical substantiation, namely reference to corpus data or a general service list of high frequency words, what ultimately goes into course books may be arbitrary. Considering Nation’s approach to specifying target vocabulary, the claim of essentiality, on the face of it, seems spurious.

As Nation and Waring (1997) have urged learners to focus on the most frequent 3,000 words of the language, it is worth determining how many of the words in 4000 Essential English Words actually satisfy this recommended benchmark. With 4000 words described and heavily marketed as essential, we should expect to find that many of the words meet minimum standards of frequency. A random selection of target words (900 words out of 4000; 150 words from each book) was checked against a list of the most frequent 3000 words in the English language (Davies & Gardner, 2010). The frequency list, based on the 385-million-word Corpus of Contemporary American English, is the largest of its kind for American English, and offers an even balance between the five genres of spoken, fiction, popular magazines, newspapers and academic journals. Of the 900 target words sampled from across the six-book series, just 32% fell within the top 3000 most frequent words. (Incidentally, only 55% of the sampled words were among the top 5,000 frequent words.) Of the six levels, only book 1 came close to satisfying the claim of essentiality: 83% of the sampled words appeared on the list. However, beyond book 1, the rate of frequency plummets. In books 2 to 6, only 22% of the sampled items were among the top 3000 words. What is pedagogically alarming is that many relatively rare words, such as blacksmith, saliva, and celestial, all made it for inclusion at the clear expense of more useful and frequent vocabulary.

All in all, despite an undeniably attractive layout, amusing and original stories, and useful vocabulary exercises, sadly, with the exception of book 1, 4000 Essential English Words ultimately fails to deliver on its sensational claim.

References

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.

Davies, M., & Gardner, D. (2010). A frequency dictionary of contemporary American English: Word sketches, collocates, and thematic lists. London: Routledge.

Nation, I.S.P. (2000) Learning vocabulary in lexical sets: dangers and guidelines. TESOL Journal 9(2), 6-10. Available: http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/staff/Publications/paul-nation/2000-Lexical-sets.pdf. [pdf]

Waring, R., & Nation, I.S.P. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage, and word lists. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 6-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available: http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/staff/Publications/paul-nation/1997-Waring-Vocab_size.pdf. [pdf]

Reviewed by
Mark Koprowski
Meiji University, Japan
<markkoprowskiatmarkyahoo.com>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.