• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Developing Courses in English for Specific Purposes

June 2012 – Volume 16, Number 1

Developing Courses in English for Specific Purposes

Author: Helen Basturkmen (2010)  
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Pages ISBN Price
157 pages 978-0-230-22798-9 $32.95 USD

Currently, ESL/EFL generalist teachers attempt to make a transition from teaching general English to teaching English for Specific Purposes (ESP) due to an increase in vocational training and learning with the spread of globalization. Helen Basturkmen (a lecturer at the University of Auckland, and an ESL teacher who has also worked in teacher education in the Middle East and the UK) has made a significant contribution in defining three major aspects of ESP course design in her book. This book fundamentally intended to portray ESP course design taking advantage of hypothetical scenarios in this regard. The book is divided into two major sections: (1) Main Considerations in ESP Course Development and (2) Case Studies in ESP Course Development.

In Chapter One, the author succinctly touches on different writers’ definitions of ESP, areas in ESP, demands of teaching ESP, and effectiveness of ESP. ESP directly addresses different communicative needs of disparate groups of learners and this meticulous analysis of learners’ work- or study-related needs is the dividing line of ESP from General English Language Teaching. The second section offers a categorization of the areas of ESP teaching: a) English for Academic Purposes (EAP), b) English for Professional Purposes (EPP) and c) English for Occupational Purposes (EOP). Defining external goals as the uses of language outside the classrooms for real world communications (Cook, 2002) specifies that ESP is concerned with these goals. Teaching ESP makes demands on teachers because it deals with domains of knowledge that average educated native speakers are not familiar with (Tudor, 1997).  Furthermore these courses often run for a limited period of time as needs change. Empirical investigations into the effectiveness of ESP teaching has been limited due to the lack of a large number of situations in which experimental study can be conducted (Johns and Dudley-Evans, 1991; Master, 2005). Catering to students’ interests and needs and dealing with limited and highly specified aims provide theoretical support for the effectiveness of ESP teaching.

In Chapter Two, the author provides an insightful notion of needs analysis as a combination of target situation analysis, present situation analysis, learner factor analysis, and teaching context analysis. Identification of activities and skills learners will use English for in the target situation; identification of learners’ present knowledge in relation to the demands of the target situation; identification of learners’ motivations, styles, and perceptions; and identification of practical possibilities and constraints of teaching context are the definitions of each step, respectively. Needs analysis plays a crucial role not only in designing ESP courses but also in refining and evaluating them. Various types of information, based on the unique situation, should be collected in the needs analysis process to meet the desired expectations of an ESP course, though literature review can be helpful in similar and comparable situations. Questionnaires, interviews, and observations are introduced as the most fruitful data collection techniques.

Chapter Three touches on the descriptions of specialist discourse as the core building block of ESP course design, furthermore defines it as communication and language use in the specialist field. The central premise in ESP course is to enable learners to communicate effectively in the unique work- or study-related settings, while each provokes its own specific ways of communication. Though investigation of specialist communication is a time-consuming endeavor, three approaches- ethnography, genre analysis, and corpus analysis- are suggested to provide the needed information. Ethnography is a form of qualitative research that has been described as study of phenomena in their natural settings, attempting to make sense of, or to interpret, phenomena in terms of the meanings people bring to them (Denzin and Lincoln, 2000, p. 3). Genre analysis is the most influential one that ends to identify patterns underlying specific genres (text type) and how particular social groups (discourse communities) organize specific types of texts (genres) to accomplish their aims (communicative purposes). Finally corpus analysis is a collection of authentic written or spoken texts available electronically and can be accessed with computer software.

In Chapter Four, the author outlines four areas of curriculum development- focusing the course, determining the course content, developing the materials, and evaluating courses and materials. In the first section, wide- and narrow-angled course designs are defined as two ends of a continuum. The first is presented as courses designed for a more general group of learners and the latter as courses for a very specific group of learners. In the second section, a distinction between real and carrier content is drawn; the first denotes pedagogical aims such as the features of language to be mastered while the latter denotes the means of delivering the real content such as the use of texts or activities (Dudley-Evans & St. John, 1998; Belcher, 2006). In the third section, course developers value the use of authentic texts and tasks that are written for purposes other than teaching and learning. In the final section, decisions should be made on whether a course revision is needed based on teachers’ and students’ evaluation of its effectiveness.

In the second part of the book, Basturkmen presents the development of two work-related and two study-related ESP courses. Each case study chapter follows the same organization. These chapters first describe the context in which the course emerged and then go to focus on the decisions taken by the course developers with regard to the three areas of ESP course design- needs analysis, investigating specialist discourse, and determining the curriculum.

Chapter Five relates to English for the police. Multiple sources of information were used to provide meticulous descriptions on the police-specific language and academic language. Police-specific language enables the learners to talk about crimes accurately and unambiguously at high speed in stressful situations and academic language focuses on academic skills such as listening to lectures, to fulfill Police College requirements. Participants’ busy schedules led to the development of a set of online lessons. In order to address officers’ individual needs, one-on-one tutorials were also provided. Internal assessment, involving the use of proficiency and competency language tests, and external assessment, involving working with the police to identify learners’ improvements to meet the language demands of Police College, were the two tools used to evaluate the course.

Chapter Six offers a description of oversea-trained doctors’ difficulties in conducting medical consultations leading to the course development. Since the needs were highly context specific, general English for Medical Doctors or research literature were not doing the job. After careful examination of needs, some criteria in the observed Consultation Appraisal Form were listed including establishing rapport, understanding the patients’ perspectives, and offering options. Observations of the role plays, authentic medical consultation, and filmed materials helped to the detection of a set of key features of the discourse in the consultation. The course was designed on a two-pronged strategy-feedback on students’ performance in role plays and input on the expert language use.

Chapter Seven examines the development of a pre-experience course in the area of English for Visual Art Studies. The course was developed because of students’ struggle on a university certificate program to enter into the bachelor degree program. In investigating needs, the teacher’s and students’ experiences and difficulties and teacher’s theoretical orientation implying that academic writing cannot be separated from disciplinary content were taken advantage of to design the course. Furthermore students’ prior textual experiences and subject knowledge and exploring genres and textual practices to foster students’ understanding of socio-historic practices and beliefs were two major principles which were incorporated into the design of the course.

The first section of Chapter Eight describes the context of course development, the postgraduate center at the university had become aware that a common problem for thesis writing was how to formulate the literature chapter, hence a workshop was to be held during the weekend and was an open-access arrangement for a wide range of disciplines. In an effort to understand needs, the teacher drew on a number of sources due to the diversity of members. In the development of the workshop sessions, discussions with the colleagues and student, research literature, and designer’s own experiences shed a better light on this regard.

The author claims the chief aim of the book is “to make the topic of ESP course development as accessible as possible to a wide audience of teachers and prospective teachers” (p. x). This end is successfully achieved through the articulation of theoretical perspectives in their general sense as well as through representation in a number of case studies.

References

Belcher, D. D. (2006). English for specific purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 133–56.

Cook, V. (2002). Language teaching methodology and the L2 user perspective. In V. Cook (ed.) Portraits of the L2 User (pp. 325-43). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dudley-Evans, T. & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Johns, A. M. & Dudley-Evans, T. (1991). ‘English for specific purposes: International in scope, specific in purpose. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 297–314.

Master, P. (2005). English for specific purposes. In E. Hinkel (ed.) Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 99–115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Tudor, I. (1997). LSP or Language Education? In R. Howard & G. Brown (eds.), Teacher education for LSP (pp. 90–102 ). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters).

Reviewed by
Javad Gholami & Masoume Dusti
Urmia University, Iran
<j.gholamiatmarkurmia.ac.ir>
<Masumedustiatmarkyahoo.com>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.