• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Curriculum Violence: America’s New Civil Rights Issue

March 2013 – Volume 16, Number 4

Curriculum Violence: America’s New Civil Rights Issue

Author: Erhabor Ighodaro & Greg Wiggan (2011)  
Publisher: Hauppauge NY: Nova Science Publishers
Pages ISBN Price
232 pages 978-1617286834 $130.00

Curriculum Violence: America’s New Civil Rights Issue provides a historical and contemporary analysis on curriculum development in the United States. Researchers and authors Erhabor Ighodaro and Greg Wiggan use their personal experiences–from Nigeria and Jamaica, respectively–to highlight problems and solution to the American educational system.

The coined term, “curriculum violence,” refers to the deliberate manipulation of academic programming in a manner that ignores or compromises the intellectual and psychological well-being of learners” (Ighodaro & Wiggan, 2011, p. 2). Through a combination of extensive research and personal experiences, the authors unveil systematic methods of curriculum manipulation and explore the damages this has done to students. Eliminating curriculum violence for African American youth is manifested through exposure, relevant information, and positive reinforcement (p. 72). The book highlights in a series of five distinct steps, the ways in which curriculum violence is manifested and likewise mediated, including: formation, deformation, conformation, reformation, and transformation. The book concludes with reflections and recommendations for practitioners to use, including tangible techniques to eliminate curriculum violence.

The authors move through the various stages of curriculum violence and provide strategies aimed at developing a non-violent curriculum. First, formation is the “theoretical framework for mind development”–-including cognitive aspects, cultural norms, and values (p. 69). The authors systematically unveil how schools decide what information is valuable for students to learn. Here, Ighodaro and Wiggan illustrate the problems of cultural falsification. Through a case study of the Miami Dade County Public School district, the state’s standardized tests, known as the FCAT, they argue that the test is a modernized manifestation of cultural domination (p. 79). Second, deformation is described as “a process of negative indoctrination,” whereby an individual loses their psychological independence (p. 81). The authors explain how this phenomenon has compounded over decades of historical pains that have negatively impacted African Americans social-psychologically, and with regards to becoming dependent on the dominant group. Sadly, this has also manifested itself throughout over a century of incorrect research, which continues to pervasively oppress African Americans. Third, conformation “embodies the condition of paralysis in which individuals lose control of initiative, discretion, and free will” (p. 101). Here, the authors examine how the violence is manifested in psycho-intellectual paralysis through the class-ceiling, etc. The fourth stage, reformation, “denotes a process of affirming and enriching the intellectual… and social well-being of learners” (p. 117). Here the African importance of community is communicated through the reclaiming of values in school, family, and support. Finally, the fifth stage is transformation, which “refers to a shift in the individual’s intellectual and psychological acuity” (p. 133). In this last and final stage, the authors examine two specific examples of deliberate and natural transformation, which proves to be successful and beneficial.

The above description of curriculum violence shows the strategic progression through the omission of pertinent cultural values and curriculum truths, as well as the falsification of history to continuously omit and oppress minority groups. Similarly, in the book Know Thy Self, Na’im Akbar explains the consequences of cultural omissions in schools. Both in Curriculum Violence and Know Thy Self, the authors advocate for the dissemination of correct, factual knowledge as opposed to hegemonic myths. In Curriculum Violence, Ighodaro and Wiggan argue for systematic curriculum changes, while Na’im Akbar argues for a personal, self-reflective change. Both texts acknowledge that a proper education can help bring healing to marginalized groups.

Curriculum Violence and Know Thy Self use Africa as a point of praxis. As Ighodaro and Wiggan reveal through a case study of Miami, Florida, Africa’s contributions have generally been removed from the United States education. In the case of Florida, even with feeble attempts to incorporate a more diverse curriculum, most educators ignore the curriculum and continue teaching to the traditional Eurocentric model due to the pressures of high-stakes state assessments. This powerful case study provides a modern example of the pervasiveness of curriculum violence. Practical, historical, and psychoanalytic views are explored throughout Curriculum Violence regarding why the African experience has been systematically eradicated from history. In the American tradition, discourse surrounding Africa has been removed from most public school curricula. The utilization of multiple paradigms to explore this phenomenon is a crystallized, salient strength of the author’s text. Without question, the pervasive, ideological domination of the Eurocentric model has compounded throughout years of multi-tier experiences and oppression.

Although Curriculum Violence reveals several systematic flaws in public education for minority youth, the premise of the authors’ research is clearly around restoration and increasing student achievement. Throughout the text, there are proverbial stories and illustrations, which add narrative and timeless principles of cultural empowerment. This is a distinctive African tradition founded in the start of humanity, which is also seen in Akbar’s Know Thy Self. The framework of Ighodaro and Wiggan’s work also supports the claims of Afrocentricity through the research. This is a direct strength of the authors’ argument about the significance and difference between African philosophies of education and the Westernized models used today. As Akbar mentioned, African centered pedagogy and curriculum design is centered on love and community. Throughout Curriculum Violence, the authors use these same Afrocentric principles in their research, by uplifting and providing a framework of transformation. In essence, the authors not only argue for the necessity of this restoration, but their work serves as a restorative piece through the use of positive principles and illustrations. This re-centers Africa back to its original place in history, saturated with these same proverbial wisdoms and knowledge used in the text.

Another strength and unique aspect of this book is its historical relation to many contemporary problems. Perhaps one of the most poignant themes throughout the book is the importance of having a historical context to analyze educational issue. When analyzing achievement data and the widely known “achievement gap”–it is important to notate the compounding effects of curriculum misinformation, inadequate educational opportunities, and unequal access to education (Ighodaro & Wiggan, 2011; Perry, Steele, & Hilliard, 2003). This “achievement gap” describes the differences in achievement between Black and White students in the United States. According to Asa Hilliard in Young, Gifted, and Black, historical events have perpetuated injustice and the unequal treatment of groups (2003). The institutionalized, ideological domination is so pervasive in the case study in Florida, that it intensifies the authors’ argument about relevance of their research today. The authors explain how critical this ignored aspect of education is, especially in urban school districts.

Although this volume is framed in a US context, teachers of English as a foreign language worldwide would benefit from this book for the additional cultural perspectives and historical contexts surrounding formalized schooling. In and outside the USA, it is critical for educators to examine what is being taught and to whom information is transmitted and at what cost to individuals and communities.

References

Akbar, N. (1998). Know Thy Self. Tallahassee: Mind Productions and Associates.

Perry, T., Steele, C., & Hilliard, A. (2003). Young Gifted and Black. Boston: Beacon Press.

Reviewed by
Marcia J. Watson
The University of North Carolina at Charlotte
<mwatso35atmarkuncc.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.