• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Nik’s Learning Technology Blog

August 2013 – Volume 17, Number 2

Title Nik’s Learning Technology Blog
Author Nik Peachey
Type of Product Blog for learning technology
Minimum Hardware Requirements Computer with internet access
Contact Information http://nikpeachey.blogspot.com/
Price Free

Introduction

Nik’s Learning Technology Blog is one of the more useful blogs for educational technologies. It guides educators and students alike to use web tools for English language teaching and learning. Not only does the blog enhance learners’ and teachers’ awareness about the educational resources available online, but it also empowers them by alerting them to where they can find these resources and how to use the resources in the language learning classroom.

Description

The navigation bar (see Figure 1) provides nine tabs for the user to explore the blog. We will visit the main tabs in this review.


Figure 1. Nik’s Learning Technology Blog navigation bar

The “home” tab contains short, clear descriptions about the selected educational technologies and the blogger’s (Nik’s) experience using them. This is where the blogger provides a summary of a resource and elicits comments, reactions, and reflections from others about the resource. As with most other blogs, posts are organized by date; newer articles/posts appear above older ones. Most of Nik’s posts are interactive, allowing blog visitors to contribute to the post. For example, in a section called “Criteria for Evaluating Web Tools and Apps” the blogger suggests some assessment criteria for evaluating the pedagogical worth of sites, incorporating a small survey for the readers to vote for the criteria suggested, sharing pros and cons for the proposed criteria and inviting the readers to suggest other criteria (see Figure 2). This unique feature of the interactive blog posts provides different points of view on the topic being discussed.


Figure 2. Homepage with an interactive post

The “More Articles” page (see Figure 3) provides a list of articles that have been published on the blog since it was started in 2007. The articles are organized chronologically, with more recent evaluations of resources appearing at the top. All articles reviewed are related to technology integration in teaching and learning.


Figure 3. “More Articles” page

On the “Free Downloads” page (see Figure 4), Nik provides his blog followers with the option to download some of his articles and documents free of charge. As stated on this page, the documents are designed to “help teachers teach themselves to use technology” and provide step-by-step picture tutorials on how to use different Web tools.


Figure 4. “Free Downloads” page

On the “Talks and Workshops” page (see Figure 5), users have the option to sign up for Nik’s face-to-face or online workshops and conference events where he trains groups of teachers and managers to appropriately use different technology and web tools. Users may sign up to receive newsletters notifying them of upcoming talks and workshops.


Figure 5. “Talks & Workshops” page

On his “E-Portfolio” page (see Figure 6), Peachey uses a website called Scoop.it to show a collection of his writings on the web, including reviews, tutorials, manuals, and articles. The page also allows users to share and comment on Peachey’s work.


Figure 6. Nik Peachey’s E-Portfolio

The “Edtech News” page (see Figure 7) displays a database of different news and research relating to learning technology on the web. Here users may read, comment on, and share technologies for free. Peachey also provides his own insight and opinions to each of the news selected.


Figure 7. News and research related to technology database

On the “Web Tools” page (see Figure 8), Peachey provides a list of web-based applications to help learners exploit particular educational resources on the web. Each resource is accompanied by his ideas for using the specific web tools in the classroom. Users are encouraged to comment on or share these “scoops.”


Figure 8. “Tools For Learners” page

Finally, Peachey allows his blog follower to stay connected to his blog through social media by incorporating a plug-in feature located on the bottom right of the home page. Icons for Twitter, Facebook, Email, and Youtube, as well as a search and translate feature, are included.

Evaluation and Applications

According to Crook et al. (2008), there are four central themes that summarize the impact of Web 2.0 application in educational settings: inquiry, collaboration, literacies, and publication (see Figure 9). The authors state, “These four themes define a set of possibilities for the appropriation of Web 2.0 in educational practice” (p. 28, 2008). In this evaluation of Nik’s Learning Technology Blog, we will examine the blog’s appropriateness for teaching and learning English in the light of the four themes suggested by Crook et al. (2008).


Figure 9. The four central themes surrounding Web 2.0 applications in education (Adapted from Crook et al., 2008)

Inquiry

Nik’s Learning Technology Blog offers a rich space for inquiry by providing a wide range of articles about educational technologies and by introducing and reviewing web tools. Another way the blog motivates users’ inquiry is with the inspiring homepage surveys which invite users to participate. The blogger also introduces interesting authentic topics on the homepage and seeks readers’ interaction and participation through voting. Thus, the blog elicits different insights about the users’ thoughts and interests and encourages the user to be “an independent learner” by “[inviting] new ways for a learner to conduct personal research” (Crook et al., 2008, p. 27).

Literacies

Navigating Nik’s Learning Technology Blog engages the learner in a variety of creative online tools and resources that can be utilized in educational settings. As a form of new literacies, this blog provides various ways of presenting ideas, expressing meanings, and introducing innovative technologies. The blog represents a creative repository for teachers, students, and digital immigrants and digital natives alike. Being rich in digital text, digital artifacts, authentic material, and new internet tools, the blog stimulates considerable growth in the users’ creative exploitation of the internet. Besides exploring the new web tools, surfing Nik’s blog involves users in learning through communication and social practices, thereby joining members in the “discourse” of new literacies by understanding language and its social context (Gee, 1999; Lankshear & Knobel, 2003).

Collaboration

The blog is a sort of social club based on text-based communication, involving identity expression and interaction between users. It allows blog users to communicate with each other and the blogger freely in a friendly and professional environment where they can eventually “learn and build knowledge” (Mcloughlin & Lee, 2007, p. 667). By joining this social club, even users with a more basic background in computer skills can participate and add to the collaborative atmosphere. Users can develop teaching skills and creative approaches to using web resources, as well as share experiences with other teachers and learners.

Publication

Nik’s blog helps its users to be publishers in many ways. First, the blog guides users by giving them a solid understanding of resources that will enable them to “make their work available to the rest of the world” (McLoughlin & Lee, 2007, p. 667). Second, Peachey leads simple, informal interactions with users and he inspires novice writers to choose their publication resources using his reviews of the tools. Third, the blogger motivates users to post their “user-generated content” (Egbert, 2005; McLoughlin & Lee, 2007) and to publish their ideas and comments, which will eventually prepare blog followers to create their own blogs and social networking accounts.

In addition to evaluating this blog using the four criteria suggested by Crook et al. (2008), it is worth noting that it is free, accessible, and simple to use, helpful for both students and teachers, and can be connected to users’ lives and previous learning (Crook, 2008; Egbert, 2005; Peachey, 2009). Finally, to evaluate this blog using the criteria suggested in Peachey’s own blog, his blog is easily learnable and teachable.

Conclusion

To summarize, Nik’s Learning Technology Blog is a very useful, interactive, and authentic resource for English language teachers. Besides the reviews of web tools, users have the option to read, download, share and/or comment on the articles or posts published in the blog. Teachers who are interested in integrating technology into their classroom can teach themselves how to do so by using the freely available resources on this blog.

References

Crook, C., Cummings, J., Fisher, F., Harrison, C., Lewin, C., Logan, K., Luckin, R., Oliver, M. & Sharples, M. (2008.). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape – opportunities, challenges and tensions. Becta Report. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1474/1/becta_2008_web2_currentlandscape_litrev.pdf

Egbert, J. (2005). CALL essentials: Principles and practice in CALL classrooms. Alexandria, Virginia: Teachers of English for Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.

Gee, J. P. (1999). Introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. (2nd Ed.). New York: Routledge.

Gee, J. P., (2010). James Paul Gee on grading with games. [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JU3pwCD-ey0

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning, 2nd Ed. London: Open University Press.

McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Extending pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In R. Atkinson & C. McBeath (Eds.), ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings of the 24th ASCILITE Conference (pp. 664–675). Singapore, December 2–5.

Peachey, N., (2009). Web 2.0 tools for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/19576895/Web-20-Tools-for-Teachers

About the Reviewers

Nadia Nsir <nnsirwsu.edu> is a faculty member at Tripoli University, Libya and currently a doctoral candidate in Language, Literacy and Technology at Washington State University. She is working as an adjunct faculty member at both Spokane Falls Community College and Gonzaga University in Washington State. Her research interests are the role of social media in ELT in Libya and the role of social media in sociopolitical changes in Libya. She is also interested in the critical discourse analysis of Libyan adolescents’ cyberlanguage.

Sarah J. Debbek <sarah.debbekwsu.edu> is an undergraduate student majoring in Digital Technology and Culture as well as Linguistics at Washington State University. She holds a certificate in online course construction. Currently she is working for the Global Campus at Washington State University.

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.