• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

English Language Teaching in South America: Policy, Preparation and Practices

November 2019 – Volume 23, Number 3

English Language Teaching in South America: Policy, Preparation and Practices

Author: Lia D. Kamhi-Stein, Gabriel Diaz Maggioli and Luciana C. de Oliveira (2017) book cover
Publisher: Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Multilingual Matters
Pages ISBN Price
Pp. 1 – 264 978-1783097968 (paper) $45.15

Readers of English Language Teaching in South America: Policy, Preparation and Practices will learn a great deal about the historical development of policies, teacher preparation, and cultural nuances of English teaching in South America.  In addition, readers’ worldviews on language teaching will be challenged by the South American teachers and scholars featured in the book, especially those who advocate for policy that prioritizes the needs of their communities before the expectations of inner-circle English speaking countries.

The insights in this book include the exploration of the development of English language education throughout seven newly democratic societies in South America as they shift away from oligarchic neoliberal institutions and set out to redirect their resources for the public good.  This book’s central goal is to evaluate the cases of Argentina, Ecuador, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Venezuela, and Brazil and measure their progress in reducing the educational inequality created by the exclusion of the working class and historically subjugated populations from English instruction (Myers-Scotton, 1993). The authors chose not to rely on scholars from inner-circle countries– nations where English is used as the primary language, such as the UK, the USA, Canada, and Australia (Kachru, 1986).  By highlighting the voices of eighteen South American teachers and editors, the book provides a valuable insider’s perspective on the region’s issues, policies, and programs.

The book is divided into three parts: English Language Policy, English Language Teacher Preparation and Professional Development, and School-Based Research and Innovative Practices.  Each part is then divided into chapters that focus on a policy or program within a particular South American country for a total of twelve chapters. The book concludes with a brief epilogue.  It is critical to first read, English Language Policy, before reviewing the other two parts.  Part One details necessary information on the geopolitical history and policy constraints of each region, providing readers important context for the latter two parts.

There are two ways a reader could digest the remainder of the book.  The first involves selectively reviewing chapters based on a particular country or program of interest (e.g., textbook programs, video-based classes).  The second way involves reviewing the whole book for a comparative sense of each country’s efforts in policy and programming.  In one example, the analysis of how Chile came to adopt its standards for English language education versus Uruguay and Ecuador is discussed.  The insight gained from this book is immensely enlightening, as the contrast of countries highlights the contexts and ways in which scholars have adapted solutions for similar types of problems.

Part One, entitled English Language Policy, surveys the diverse historical contexts culminating in the standards and policies presently institutionalized in seven countries, as well as the unique characteristics of each country’s English language educational development.  One example is Uruguay’s long history of foreign language teaching but critical shortage of English teachers.  This issue has lead to the expansion of remote video-conferencing as a central component of Uruguay’s language education program.  Another case is Brazil’s uniquely high investment in its national school textbook program which provides textbooks to every student in the country and gives teachers ample control of textbook selection.  A central theme across all countries is the mission to expand English to populations that previously lacked opportunities to learn the language.  The authors also reflect on some challenges with educational reform, such as the tendency for top-level policymakers to implement decisions without the consultation of local teachers. Instead, policymakers rely on consultants from inner-circle countries to validate the integrity of their programs.  The book criticizes these decisions, noting that programs adopted from the British Council or the U.S. Embassy do not distinguish between the countries that they are employed in and are often adopted without public debate.  Part One suggests that, as these countries transition to progressive societies committed to the public good, English language teaching policies should prioritize local needs and contexts before the adherence to the standards of foreign parties.

Parts Two and Three describe ways in which different regions have accommodated their unique contexts to produce individualized initiatives in teacher preparation and content delivery.  These parts contain chapters that describe research-supported initiatives and provide evaluations of their strengths and weaknesses.  These initiatives include a partnership between the U.S. Embassy and Ecuador’s Education Ministry to develop a teacher curriculum, as well as Argentina’s Connecting Equality initiative to close the digital literacy gap in some of Buenos Aires’ historically underserved neighborhoods.  These chapters showcase the variety of paths taken to confront localized constraints and improve the service of English language teaching.  The chapters also provide thoughtful reflections on each region’s achievements and implications for future improvements.

In the epilogue, the book states its two-fold intention: To expose readers to emerging English instruction initiatives that are occurring in South America and to describe the challenges that scholars face in adapting inner-circle pedagogies to meet the realities of students and teachers in South America.  For these two purposes, this book offers utility for English teachers preparing to teach in the region.  Prospective teachers can use this book to understand the aspirations and needs of the students they will serve and teachers with whom they will collaborate.  Also, this book can inform teachers and policymakers about ongoing work in the area and how to best support its progress.  Finally, for teachers from abroad, the historical context provided by this book can help to avoid arbitrarily imposing inner-circle expectations and perpetuating a cycle of neo-colonialism.  Rather, the insight from this book can make foreign teachers better allies to help South American teachers achieve outcomes for their students on their own terms.

The strengths of this book include the indispensable insider’s perspective that it provides on educational issues in South America, as explained by scholars who have a true passion for the success of English language education for all South American students.  It provides a comprehensive and comparative history of education, and it connects this history to current programs.

One weakness of the book is that its scope does not include a focus on day-to-day educational issues.  While there is information on innovative programs being used in the region, it would be beneficial to devote more space to describing traditional methods upon which these innovative programs are meant to improve.  The avant-garde programs discussed in the book will likely play a large role in the future of teacher education in the region; however, showcasing those programs comes at the expense of providing more typical teacher preparation and content delivery.

English Language Teaching in South America: Policy, Preparation, and Practices offers valuable perspectives on the sociocultural state of teacher education in the region.  The well-regarded local scholars who contributed to this book have identified and described initiatives that will likely set the regional standard for English language education in the near future.  Thus, I recommend this book to any English language teacher with an interest in South American education.

References

Kachru, B. B. (1986). The power and politics of English. World Englishes, 5(2– 3), 121– 40.

Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Elite closure as a powerful language strategy: The African case. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 103(1), 149– 64.

Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2014). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Reviewed by
Antonio Martin Losavio
University of Central Florida
<Amlosa01atmarkknights.ucf.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.
Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.