• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Introduction to the Special Issue: Disrupted Language Teacher Identities in Times of Uncertainty

May 2024 – Volume 28, Number 1

https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.28109s0

Hyunjin Jinna Kim
Stony Brook University
<hyunjinjinnakatmarkgmail.com>

Huseyin Uysal
Knox College
<huysal9atmarkgmail.com>

Language Teacher Identities and Global Shifts: A Brief Introduction

The English language teaching (ELT) profession is at its precipice with large-scale global events and transitions in the recent decade. Changes in global alliances, international conflicts, geopolitical tensions, wars, economic crises, and global climate changes brought uncertainties to the world and the ELT landscape. In this special issue, Between Indisposition and Perseverance: Disrupted Language Teacher Identities in Times of Uncertainty, we explore how English language teachers, researchers, and professionals grapple with indispositions from social, historical, political, economic, and emotional dilemmas in times of uncertainty.

The gradual impact of declining birthrates, downsizing of the teaching and ELT profession, decreasing transnational mobility, global climate change impacting economic recession escalated with the COVID-19 pandemic, and other sociopolitical tensions and movements shifted the research and praxis in the field of ELT. The declining birthrates have inevitably affected student enrollments worldwide, which, in return, disrupted the market for educational resources. The disruption of the educational resources market results in lower quality of education, inequity in access to education, less funding or investment in education, and more hurdles for international education (Chen, 2020; Marturello, 2021). Beyond the boundaries of countries known for hosting majority international students or top destinations for studying abroad, the current globalization period is claimed to be threatening the field of international education and ELT profession marked by catastrophic climate change, growing inequality, war, neoliberalism, resurgent nationalism, and other macro-level issues worldwide (Ilieva et al., 2014; Jornitz & Timm, 2022; Reeves, 2018; Silova, 2021; Yazan, 2022). ELT professionals across the world are waking up to the reality of the fate of the field being heavily controlled by a turmoil of social changes and pressured by various stakeholders.

Concerns are spiraling as ELT professionals adapt to the new era of changes while feeling undervalued with a lack of support and resources to advance the field. As the multilingual reality trenches into this 21st-century society, the pushback voices of seeking unity and singularity become louder. Although the economic market promotes English language teaching as a valuable resource to advance an individual’s knowledge and access, significant budget cuts in the educational field worldwide have limited the advancement of the field (Cai & Fang, 2022). At the same time, educational policies undergirding neoliberalism attempt to transform education into for-profit businesses and open new avenues for reframing assimilation and alienation (Kubota & Takeda, 2021). Language teacher identity (LTI) research is critical to understanding teachers’ beliefs, values, and commitment, which, in return, improves language teaching (Kanno & Stuart, 2011; Stenberg et al., 2014; Yazan, 2017). It is fundamental to question and redefine the contemporary theoretical lenses by imagining LTIs beyond the ELT community and examining the emerging global factors (e.g., financial, governmental, physical, and emotional factors) within the larger socio-political climate. While countless ELT professionals feel indispositions in their institutions, research fields, political climates, local communities, and global discourse, we seek opportunities to heal through collaborative and humanizing exploration of LTIs in this special issue.

Language Teacher Identities

LTIs have been studied, theorized, and researched by numerous and prominent scholars for decades. However, a structured and concise definition specific to language teachers is yet to be provided in the previous scholarship. LTI has been studied and interrogated through the lenses of the theorization and philosophies of scholars who discussed teacher identities in general (e.g., Alsup, 2008; Beauchamp & Thomas, 2009; Danielewicz, 1995; Gee, 2001; Olsen, 2008; Sachs, 2005; Wenger, 1998). LTI has also been theorized and explored to understand the elements and aspects that shape teachers’ identities who are teaching language (e.g., Barkhuizen, 2017; Norton, 2013; Pennington & Richards, 2016; Varghese et al., 2005). Despite the wide array of research and scholarship examining LTI, a clear definition that distinguishes a “language teacher” identity from a “teacher” identity of a language teacher remains a gap in our knowledge and understanding of LTIs.

In an attempt to provide a concise definition of “language teacher” identity, here in this special issue, we define LTI as an evolving process, holistic engagement, and a framework through which language teachers, as agentic beings, understand their positions (including self-positioning and positioning by others) and relationship to language, language learners, and the language teaching profession–how to be, act, and understand themselves and regarded by others–across time and space, including a collection of influences from immediate contexts, sociohistorical and ideological world, and the possibilities for advocacy-action, change, and transformation in the future.

In research and practice, LTI has gained increasing interest and attention as part of scholarly discussions to shed light on the belief, value, and commitment of language teachers, professionals, and researchers. Recent research has demonstrated the saliency of LTIs to teacher learning, practice, and growth as framing teacher professional development with an LTI lens affords the space to form agency and enact their identities. Although there is an emerging body of literature that dissects the intersections of LTIs with personal and social identities, there is a need to tackle macro-level issues by zooming out of the individual-level analysis and critically examining LTIs through a multifaceted lens. LTIs are situated on the macro-level of ideological structures, including belief systems, cultural values, political values, religious values, and economic values (The Douglas Fir Group, 2016). Thus, engaging in conversations concerning LTI construction informed and shaped by recent issues allows us to make sense of the ever-shifting social, cultural, historical, political, and economic contexts that impact the ELT profession.

Featured Articles in this Special Issue

In organizing and constructing LTIs in the unprecedented new era, featured articles in this special issue draw on numerous prominent works and theorizations with specific attention to the current social, cultural, historical, and political contexts.

The special issue opens with articles investigating LTIs internally and their interplay with the surrounding sociocultural contexts. Matthew Nall and Takaaki Hiratsuka’s A Future of Hope and Dread: How K-12 Pre-service Language Teachers are Situating Their Identities within Modern Japanese Value and Belief Systems delves into pre-service LTIs in Japan by employing a robust mixed-methods approach and combining narrative frames and interviews. By using grounded theory and a process model of emotional regulation, it unveils a nuanced narrative of hope and dread. The study effectively illuminates the complexities of LTI construction and offers implications for constructing positive future-selves identities amid the complex sociocultural contexts and value systems in Japan that complicate their LTIs.

Next, Aysel Eyerci’s article, EFL Teachers’ Responses to Crisis: Investigating Pedagogical Adaptations, Trauma-Sensitive Practices, and Teacher Identity after Earthquake, explores the adaptations made by a senior EFL teacher in Turkey during emergency remote teaching post-earthquake. The study highlights the complex process of LTI construction and negotiation, where empathy, resilience, and professional collaboration played a significant role in dealing with a devastating and traumatic event. The study informs educational policies and practices for effective crisis response in language education.

The following articles paid more attention to deeply rooted religious beliefs, social ideologies, and policies that (re)shaped and constrained LTI negotiation and construction processes. At the same time, these studies highlight language teachers’ agencies, assertions of their positions, and skillful navigation of ideological constraints. Mostafa Nazari’s article, Ecological Intersections of Religious Ideology, Agency, and Identity: Voices of Iranian English Language Teachers, draws on ecological perspectives to explore the intersection of religious ideology, agency, and identity among Iranian English language teachers. The study sheds light on how Islamic principles permeate various aspects of teachers’ work and their identities, while teachers’ agency acts of resistance also resulted in developing critical awareness. The article provides valuable insights into language teacher agency, identity, and ideology, emphasizing the dialectic relationship between teachers and religious ideologies.

Sibel Söğüt’s Disrupted English Language Teacher Identities: A Social Justice Perspective is another article that pays particular attention to the ecological (re)construction and negotiation of LTIs. As this exploratory case study probes into the identities of two in-service and three pre-service teachers in Turkey, factors pertaining to dominant ideologies, policies, and language education contexts are analyzed in relation to micro, meso, and macro-level identity constructs. The author underscores the pronounced impact of dominant ideologies and policies on LTIs and implies significant ramifications concerning the apparent disconnect between policy frameworks and the practical realities of teaching English.

In Chinese EFL Academics’ Experiences of Aligning Researcher Identity (Re)-Construction with University Policy Practices of a National Research Policy, Hua Lu and Sook Jhee Yoon present the impact of national-level policies on college-level language teacher-researcher identities. This case study of six EFL academics at a public university in China investigates the identity alignment and misalignment processes in regard to the change in macro- and meso-level policies. The authors highlight EFL academics’ identity conflicts as well as exercising their agencies amidst institutional and national policy constraints.

The studies that we feature in this special issue serve as a testament to the ongoing quest to understand LTIs as a multifaceted endeavor and to listen to the voices of language teachers. As we conclude this special issue, we emphasize the importance of acknowledging, valuing, and validating LTIs as a core framework to understand the work, motivation, and struggles of language teachers. In times of uncertainty, it is imperative to hear and amplify the voices of language teachers as we move forward to providing an equitable and responsive educational space for language learners. As we embark on future research, we encourage inquiries that use innovative methodological approaches and ecological lenses to capture the intricacies of LTIs and the ever-evolving socio-cultural contexts and policy landscapes.

Acknowledgments

The manuscripts in this special issue were evaluated by a panel of expert reviewers, who provided insightful comments that were critical in enhancing the quality of the submitted work. We extend our sincere appreciation to all the dedicated reviewers below for their invaluable contribution to the success of this special issue.

  • Aysel Eyerci, Atatürk University, Turkey
  • Cris Delatado Barabas, McGill University, Canada
  • Hua Lu, Anhui Polytechnic University, China
  • Jesse W. C. Yip, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Matthew Nall, Miyagi University, Japan
  • Mostafa Nazari, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
  • Shuwen Liu, University of Macau, China
  • Sibel Söğüt, Sinop University, Turkey
  • Trung M. Nguyen, Oregon State University, the United States

About the Guest Editors

Hyunjin Jinna Kim is a Postdoctoral Associate at Stony Brook University, coordinating and designing inclusive curricula and instruction for diverse students in higher education. Her research broadly focuses on issues related to minoritized linguistic, cultural, ethnic, and racial identities in education and ways to provide equitable and inclusive education. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3977-8667

Huseyin Uysal is a Visiting Assistant Professor at Knox College, teaching courses focusing on ESL and bilingual education. His scholarship focuses on identity, power, and inclusivity issues in linguistically and culturally diverse schools. His research interests include fairness, justice and equity in language assessment, English learner reclassification, and plurilingualism at public schools. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2499-3097

To Cite this Article

Kim, H. J. & Uysal, H. (2024). Introduction to the special issue: Disrupted language teacher identities in times of uncertainty. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 28(1). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.28109s0

References

Alsup, J. (2008). Teacher identity discourses: Negotiating personal and professional spaces. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Barkhuizen, G. (Ed.) (2017). Reflections on language teacher identity research. Routledge.

Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: an overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39 (2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252

Cai, Y., & Fang, F. (2022). TESOL in transition: Examining stakeholders’ use of and attitudes toward translanguaging and multimodal practices in EFL contexts. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 19(1), 7–33. http://doi.org/10.30397/TJTESOL.202204_19(1).0001

Chen, G. (2020, December 30). What you need to know about public schools in a recession. Public School Review. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/blog/what-you-need-to-know-about-public-schools-in-a-recession

Danielewicz, J. (1995). Teaching selves: Identity, pedagogy, and teacher education. State University of New York Press.

Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X025001099

Ilieva, R., Beck, K., & Waterstone, B. (2014). Towards sustainable internationalisation of higher education. Higher Education, 68(6), 875–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9749-6

Jornitz, S., & Timm, S. (2022). Education systems between global changes and national orientations. In S. Jornitz & M. Parreira do Amaral (Eds.), The education systems of the Americas: Global education systems (pp. 15–36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41651-5_22

Kanno, Y., & Stuart, C. (2011). Learning to become a second language teacher: Identities-in-practice. The Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01178.x

Kubota, R., & Takeda, Y. (2021). Language‐in‐education policies in Japan versus transnational workers’ voices: Two faces of neoliberal communication competence. TESOL Quarterly, 55(2), 458–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.613

Marturello, M. (2021, September 10). Geopolitical events create hurdles for international students. The Herald Republican. https://www.kpcnews.com/heraldrepublican/article_a15ba516-7634-5f6b-9cd3-7a00e96d28d7.html

Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation. Multilingual Matters.

Olsen, B. (2008). Teaching what they learn, learning what they live: How teachers’ personal histories shape their professional development. Paradigm Publishers.

Pennington, M. C., & Richards, J. C. (2016). Teacher identity in language teaching: Integrating personal, contextual, and professional factors. RELC Journal, 47(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216631219

Reeves, J. (2018). Teacher identity work in neoliberal schooling spaces. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.002

Sachs, J. (2005). Teacher education and the development of professional identity: Learning to be a teacher. In P. Denicolo and M. Kompf (Eds.), Connecting policy and practice: Challenges for teaching and learning in schools and universities (pp. 5–21). Routledge.

Silova, I. (2021). Facing the anthropocene: Comparative education as sympoiesis. Comparative Education Review, 65(4), 587–616.

Stenberg, K., Karlsson, L., Pitkaniemi, H., & Maaranen, K. (2014). Beginning student teachers’ teacher identities based on their practical theories. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.882309

The Douglas Fir Group (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44134994

Varghese, M., Morgan, B., Johnston, B., & Johnson, K. A. (2005). Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 4(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327701jlie0401_2

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identities. Cambridge University Press.

Yazan, B. (2017). “It just made me look at language in a different way:” ESOL teacher candidates’ identity negotiation through teacher education coursework. Linguistics and Education, 40, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.06.002

Yazan, B. (2022). Language teacher educator identity. In J. I. Liontas & M. DelliCarpini (Eds.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. TESOL International Association. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt1025

Copyright of articles rests with the authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.
Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.