• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Learning a language with peers: Elevating classroom voices

May 2025 – Volume 29, Number 1

https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.29113r1

Learning a language with peers: Elevating classroom voices

Author: Rebecca Adams and Rhonda Oliver (2023) book cover
Publisher: Routledge
Pages e-ISBN Price
pp. x + 163 9780367815790 $49.45 (e-book)

The potential of peer interaction to benefit second/foreign language (L2) learning has long been an interest in the field of second language acquisition (SLA). A large body of research associated with Instructed SLA has reported that peer interaction enhances L2 learning because it creates opportunities for learners to negotiate for meaning, to provide and receive corrective feedback, and to modify their language output (Loewen & Sato, 2018). However, despite such benefits, language teachers may not apply the findings of research in their teaching partly due to a lack of access to such evidence and partly due to their limited time to engage with research (Hwang et al., 2024). More importantly, teaching practitioners often perceive findings of research as irrelevant for their classroom practice suggesting a divide between teachers and second language researchers. The book ‘Learning a language with peers: Elevating classroom voices’ by Rebecca Adams and Rhonda Oliver reports an empirical study that aimed to help bridge these gaps by sharing teachers’ voices about their experiences and challenges of implementing peer interaction in their teaching. This book contributes to the field of language teaching by presenting empirical evidence and also proposing innovative techniques for implementing peer learning approaches in L2 learning contexts.

The book is organized into 8 chapters that thematically describe two key areas of peer interaction: a) teachers’ perspectives about the role of peer interaction for L2 learning, and b) how peer interaction is used in real-world language learning classrooms in diverse educational contexts. Following Chapter 1, which provides an overview of the research findings on the benefits of peer interaction for L2 learning, Chapter 2 describes the empirical study at the heart of this book and the data gathering instruments and data analysis procedures the authors used. Initially, a survey was used to explore teachers’ beliefs and perceptions about and use of peer interaction in L2 teaching and learning, and then a follow-up interview was conducted with 16 ESL teachers to investigate their beliefs about the role of peer interaction in language teaching and their reflections about successful and unsuccessful experiences with peer interaction. Finally, observations of ESL classrooms were conducted to obtain clear descriptions of interactive activities implemented in language classes.

The results of the study in Chapter 3 present key findings on the role of peer interaction for L2 learning. Among others, teachers considered peer interaction as beneficial for building confidence and motivation, for creating a social context for learners, and for helping them to develop language fluency. However, it was found that the peer interaction approach is rarely used to enhance learner literacy skills such as reading and writing (Chapter 4), highlighting the need for more research on these aspects of peer learning. Additionally, teachers reported difficulties when implementing interactive activities in computer-mediated contexts due to a number of issues, such as lack of access on the internet, technological glitches and lack of experience and sufficient pedagogical knowledge of peer learning approaches online (Chapter 5).

Teacher concerns regarding the use of peer learning approaches also involved other issues such as teaching context (EFL vs. ESL), curricular demands, class sizes, and learners’ ages (Chapter 6). For example, it was found that peer learning activities are more popular in ESL than EFL classrooms. The implementation of a peer interaction approach was more difficult in large classes than small ones. To address these concerns the book provides clear guidance and practice-based solutions for implementing peer learning approaches with learners that differ in terms of their cultural backgrounds, ages, and learning contexts EFL vs. ESL (Chapter 7). Finally, Chapter 8 highlights the teachers’ need for more knowledge about implementing peer learning activities, and it recommends new areas for future research that would drive learning     through peer interaction.

This book stands out for several reasons. First, unlike previous studies that examined peer interaction from learners’ perspectives in specific contexts, the current volume examines peer interaction approaches from teachers’ perspectives from a wide range of contexts, making it unique in the field. Second, although the existing research highlights the benefits of peer interaction and includes recommendations for its use in L2 classrooms (e.g., Adams & Oliver, 2019; Sato & Ballinger, 2016), few attempts have been made to make the findings comprehensible for language teachers who often do not understand how to incorporate such findings into their teaching practice (Sato & Loewen, 2019). The current work not only presents new evidence on peer interaction research but also provides a step-by-step guide on how language teachers can implement peer learning activities in their classrooms. In this way, the book informs language teachers on the benefits of peer interaction for L2 teaching and learning, and it also equips them with innovative techniques for implementing it in their teaching contexts. Third, with all of the stages of data collection and data analysis procedures clearly explained, the book serves as a guide for both novice and experienced researchers to carry out similar investigations. Teachers can use this research guide to explore areas that are closely connected to their teaching goals and bring about positive changes in their teaching pedagogy (Lázaro-Ibarrola, 2023; Sippel & Sato, 2022). Highlighting new areas of research on peer reading and writing, the book ends by encouraging both teachers and researchers to create joint research agendas that would enhance the language teaching pedagogy through peer interaction approach.

Despite its strengths, the book is not without limitations. First, although the authors claimed they collected data from educators around the world, the majority of participants were from North America and Asia. To have a better representation of the findings researchers could gather data from educators in other continents such as Europe, South America, or Africa. Second, all of the participants were teachers of English, making it hard to establish whether the findings obtained from English teachers would hold true for teachers of other languages. Including teachers of other languages in the study could contribute to a better generalizability of the findings. Finally, the observational data were limited to only 16 ESL classrooms. This makes it hard to establish how EFL teachers dealt with challenges when implementing peer learning activities, particularly in large classes. This is especially important when taking into account that peer interaction approaches, as noted by the authors, are less common in EFL settings.

Overall, the book brings an important contribution to the field of SLA. Pedagogically, it introduces innovative techniques of using peer interaction approaches in L2 teaching and learning contexts. Theoretically, it expands the current literature on peer interaction with new evidence from language teachers. Methodologically, it offers clear guidance on using specific data gathering instruments such as surveys, interviews and observations to investigate important aspects of peer interaction approach. Therefore, the book is recommended for novice and experienced researchers, language teachers, and students of applied linguistics who are interested in peer learning approaches.

About the Reviewer

Nuhi Bllaca received his Ph.D in English and American Studies from the University of Vienna, Austria, where he currently works as a lecturer of English Linguistics. His main research interests include peer interaction, collaborative writing, and written corrective feedback, especially among non-adult learners. <nuhi.bllacaatmarkunivie.ac.at> ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2980-2456

To Cite this Review

Bllaca, N. (2025). [Review of the book. (2023), Learning a language with peers: Elevating classroom voices, by Rebecca Adams and Rhonda Oliver]. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 29 (1). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.29113r1

References

Adams, R. J., & Oliver, R. (2019). Teaching through peer interaction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315115696

Hwang, H.-B., Coss, M. D., Sato, M., Cárcamo, B., Nguyen, M. X. N. C., Dao, P., Iwashita, N.,Marsden, E., Hawkes, R., Loewen, S., Scheffler, P., Baranowska, K., McKinley, J., & Ortega, L. (2024). (Re)Examining the research–practice interface: International perspectives, multiple methods, persistent challenges, and novel directions. Language Teaching, Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444824000181

Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. (2023). Child L2 writers: A room of their own. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.32

Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. G. (Eds.). (2016). Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45

Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2019). Do teachers care about research? The research–pedagogy dialogue. ELT Journal, 73(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy048

Sippel, L., & Sato, M. (2022). Teacher beliefs about second language research and researchers: Different roles at research‐oriented universities. The Modern Language Journal, 106(3), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12797

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.
Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.