• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Innovation in University-Based Intensive English Programs: From Start to Future

August 2025 – Volume 29, Number 2

https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.29114r1

Innovation in University-Based Intensive English Programs: From Start to Future

Author: Jason Litzenberg (Ed.) (2023) book cover
Publisher: Multilingual Matters
Pages e-ISBN Price
pp. xvi + 248 978-1-80041-443-3 $39.95 (Paperback)

An Intensive English Program (IEP) usually refers to any type of program that provides international students with an immersion-style environment for learning academic English, prior to matriculating into a full-time college or university degree program. The field of applied linguistics has always maintained a symbiotic relationship with IEPs, with programs serving as sites for teacher training, curriculum development, and research implementation (Orlando, 2016). Despite this, IEPs frequently struggle for recognition with many in the field viewing them as “not worthy of notice, time and effort” (p.2). Indeed, most publications involving IEPs tend to be limited in scope, focusing more upon the administrative aspects of program operations, with little consideration of mechanisms for sustainability. Jason Litzenberg addresses this gap in his recent edited volume Innovation in University-Based Intensive English Programs: From Start to Future. By considering the past, present and future directions of innovation in US-based IEPs, the present volume assumes a broader stance towards innovation. More specifically, while the contributors of this book consider IEPs and IEP practices, they also attempt to expand outward and assess the impact of IEP innovations beyond the traditional boundaries of the programs themselves.

Following an overview by the editor, the book consists of 13 loosely connected chapters all relating to IEPs. The first three chapters focus on the historical aspects of IEPs, beginning with the establishment of University of Michigan’s English Language Institute (ELI) in 1941, which was widely regarded as the first IEP (Chapter 1). Applied linguistics research and IEPs share a more than 50-year history of mutually benefiting one another (Fang, 2020), but the pinnacle of IEP-supported applied linguistics publications shows a majority of them appearing across the leading journals (e.g., Language Learning) between 1976-1987 (Chapter 2).  Around this time, many former directors of IEP programs got their start in the field, coming of age in a ‘Wild West’ of IEP development, research and implementation (Chapter 3). After reviewing how IEPs came to be, the volume turns to current operations and practices, with an eye towards the future. Subsequent chapters cover empirical studies and systematic reviews of varying issues such as employment trends of IEPs (Chapter 4), IEP services (Chapter 5), IEP impact on campus culture (Chapter 6), and IEP teacher education (Chapter 10). These studies provide      realistic and concrete profiles of diverse IEPs, laying the foundation to expand our perspectives and create alternatives.

The volume also discusses calls for possible radical reforms. These innovations include a myriad of topics, such as IEP Practitioner-Administrator-Scholar (PAS) identity (Chapter 7), native-speakerism scholarship (Chapter 8), and IEP partnership (Chapter 9). In these cases, innovation means acknowledging hard and honest truths in order to engage in the critical reflection needed for actual meaningful reform (Christison & Stoller, 2023). The book also addresses the important role of technology, with the authors urging the incorporation of communities of practice into the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, exploring the ways technology may continue to influence English language classrooms and offering warnings as well as suggestions for moving forward that help practitioners “not to lose sight of our bigger goals in education and our humanity” (p. 205) (Chapter 12). The book closes with a forward-thinking approach that poses critical questions for future directions of IEPs and discusses opportunities for further research, such as reimagined partnerships and applied technology skills (Chapter 13).

A major strength of this volume is that the chapters discuss IEPs  on a range of different levels, representing one of  the few attempts to go beyond describing administrative aspects of IEPs. What sets this book apart from other texts, however, is that the contributions each address the idea that “IEPs are intrinsically bound with innovation” (p. 5). While the authors do not adhere to a single conceptualization of innovation, the contributions demonstrate various interpretations of it and how they engaged with the concept. In some ways, these contributions are qualitative expressions of how practitioners interpret innovation. To illustrate, Chapter 9 argues that equitable and bilateral communication among stakeholders is essential for long-term and sustainable IEP projects. Such recognition is fundamental for educators who wish to align their practices with the changing needs of society (Christison & Stoller, 2023). What’s more, the book is distinctive in challenging the “peripheral positioning of IEPs” (p. 116).  For instance, Chapter 7 argues that IEP educators could adopt “the multiple roles of Blended EAP Professionals” (p.119), developing professional and scholarly identities which help bring attention to a field that deserves more attention than it has received in past decades. Another strength of the book is that the authors attempt to close the gap between researchers and practitioners. For instance, by exploring the practical experiences of two co-authored participants in a Brazilian English teachers’ program, Chapter 10 argues for applying theory to practice, emphasizing that the internationalization of English teachers’ continuing education should be reevaluated and conceived from a “bottom-up perspective that considers local issues and centers teacher voices” (p. 161).  In short, the volume successfully accomplishes its purpose.

Nevertheless, some shortcomings should be noted. For one, while the chapters advocate that IEPs should embrace “multiculturalism” in curriculum experimentation (e.g., Chapter 7), the book does not offer any practical suggestions on how IEPs can resist and combat the current trends of isolationism, nationalism, and anti-intellectualism, which remains an important area of inquiry for IEPs (Christison & Stoller, 2023). Alternatively, while IEPs have provided research sites for applied linguists and language teacher preparation, topics such as how pre-service and in-service IEP educators can get the appropriate training in order to remain competitive and relevant are still untouched. Finally, despite arguments against native-speakerism, the book would have benefitted from offering some critical and reflective examples of IEP educators challenging racism in their practices, providing ESL teachers the flexibility to follow in their own teaching contexts.

Despite these critiques, the volume provides a well-written and thorough exploration of what IEP innovation means at US universities. Although the IEPs discussed here are US-centered, this volume could be relevant for many language programs, program administrators, researchers, and applied linguists around the world. This book will be of great interest to IEP educators who are looking to innovate in their programs, but also to applied linguists and ESL/EFL teachers who are interested in reflecting on their own working environments because the issues covered can address particular needs and challenges that may arise in varied contexts.

About the Reviewer

Dong Wang is a professor of Applied Linguistics at Shandong Normal University, China. He received his PhD from Shanghai International Studies University and has considerable EFL teaching experiences at tertiary levels in the Chinese context. His research interests focus on the history of English, second/foreign language acquisition and teacher education. His publications have appeared in English Today, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development and many key academic journals in China. <dwang@sdnu.edu.cn> ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7380-2387

To Cite this Review

Wang, D. (2025). [Review of the book Innovation in university-based intensive English programs: From start to future, by Jason Litzenberg (Ed.)]. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 29 (2). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.29114r1

References

Christison, M., & Stoller, F. L. (2023). English Language Program Administration: Leadership and Management in the 21st Century. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28601-8

Fang, F. (2020). Re-positioning accent in the global English paradigm: A critical phenomenological case study in the Chinese context. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351061308

Orlando, R. D. (2016). Teaching English in US University Intensive English Programs. TESOL Press.

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.
Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.