• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Literacy at the Crossroads: Crucial Talk About Reading, Writing, and Other Teaching Dilemma

September 1998 — Volume 3, Number 3

Literacy at the Crossroads: Crucial Talk About Reading, Writing, and Other Teaching Dilemmas

Regie Routman (1996)
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
Pp. xviii + 222
ISBN 0-435-07210-2 (paper)
US $19.50

Regie Routman set out to write a political book when she wrote Literacy at the Crossroads. Public schools have been attacked by political critics riding the “back to basics” bandwagon. This well-written, and even heartening, book portrays the many sides of language arts teachers’ professional lives. Her portrayal describes the political challenges facing them and proposes effective strategies for meeting, overcoming, and more importantly, winning over these critics, or at least the parents of the school children.

The book consists of three parts. The first part, “Dealing with the Politics of Education,” examines school bashing and whole language criticism. This examination relates three cases of failed and successful school innovations. Then it explores the realities and misinterpretations of whole language. The section concludes with proposals for different approaches to becoming political, including teachers arming themselves with the facts and listening to, communicating with, and involving parents. Part 2, “Back to Basics and Other Teaching Dilemmas,” portrays some central educational controversies confronting language arts teachers. These controversies revolve around the supposed solutions to the “failure” of whole language: back to basics, phonics, and teaching spelling and grammar. “Empowerment for Life,” the final part, proposes different ways for teachers and students to gain control of their schools, their teaching, and their education. She concludes this section by challenging teachers to lead the type of literacy life they want their students to lead.

Literacy at the Crossroads is not one-sided or narrowly ideological. It does not engage in lambasting the critics, thus avoiding further polarization. Instead it is a considered and principled response to the politicizing of literacy instruction exemplified in the criticism of the whole language approach. Since the publisher, Heineman, is a leading publisher of whole language theory and research, we might expect a less well-balanced book. What we get is a book which answers the critics of whole language in a reasonable manner. By using research and classroom-based examples, Routman shows how the whole language approach does the very things critics say it does not do, plus a great deal more, in providing the type of education parents and citizens want for their children. [-1-] Routman espouses a different type of approach than the one practiced in these days of heated polemics. She provides measured suggestions for gaining a political position when educational debate is politicized, suggestions which ESL professionals might find useful if their programs have been affected by political debates on bilingual education, Ebonics, or the English Only movement. The basic approach consists of listening to the concerns of the critics, revealing what is actually happening in classrooms, explaining how what is happening addresses the concerns of parents or other worried individuals, and speaking knowledgeably about educational issues. She argues that the way for teachers to create classrooms where teachers are learners, and where students can attain competence and self-respect, is by being political. Teachers become political by “speaking out, knowing the research, writing proposals, experimenting in [their] own classrooms and schools, and sharing [their] results with local and national audiences” (p. 165). This approach demands that teachers become the type of people they are guiding their students into becoming. Teachers need to be responsible representatives of their profession, not speaking only the language of the profession, but also communicating in the language of the parents and students.

Routman directs some criticism at teachers who claim to be whole language, but who fail to understand its full meaning. Whole language does not exclude phonics or the teaching of spelling. Phonics is a part of learning to read, an essential, but not total part of the process of acquiring literacy; thus phonics should be part of whole language teachers’ repertoires. Teachers may not be totally at fault since it appears some education departments fail to train their teachers in phonics. Furthermore, she points out that only a small percentage of children, the truly learning disabled, need the intensive phonics training espoused by the phonics supporters. She also argues for the necessity of teaching spelling while also honoring the early invented spellings, which she points out reflect phonics learning, as the student progresses toward becoming a literate user of the language. To support this progression, she supplies eight guidelines for setting up an environment for encouraging students to become good spellers. These eight guidelines encourage attention to spelling in authentic ways. Routman further argues for explicit modeling and showing students how to do something when the time is right.

Since this is not an ESL book per se, nor does it delve into research or questions concerning second language teaching, ESL professionals might decide not to read the book. This decision would deprive them of the opportunity to think about whole language issues, which are not that different from those faced by ESL professionals. We need only to consider the debates about grammar-based curricula and skills emphases. Furthermore, many issues that Routman raises about assessment, modeling literacy, and extensive reading could have come out of current ESL discussions. Not only [-2-] does she offer suggestions for the classroom, such as displaying for writing lists of action verbs that come from the students, she also offers sound suggestions for developing and supporting teacher growth through sharing materials and ideas and through joining support groups. Just as importantly, she examines issues of teacher development, from the initial support a new teacher needs to the ongoing support teachers need to re-envision their classrooms and deal with change.

The final section of Literacy at the Crossroads shares with the readers the importance of teacher research. Routman shows how teacher research has informed her teaching. More importantly, she shows how doing such research and sharing it with colleagues and students can empower the classroom by enabling teachers to practice and model the inquiry and reflection that they are asking of their students.

A final reason for picking up this non-ESL book is that, like other books written by committed teachers (Ashton-Warner, 1963; Paley, 1981, 1986, 1992) or about such teachers (Kidder, 1989), the book reminds us of why people became teachers and what they are doing right. There is no library of books like this for ESL teachers, books that richly portray the lives of teachers and show how they deal with the various problems they face. Without such a library we need to rely on books such as Routman’s not only for ideas, but for encouragement. Perhaps, as ESL as a field commits itself to teacher research and its many possibilities, books will emerge that serve a similar function. Until that time, we need voices reminding us of what we can do and providing visions of possibilities where blank walls may now stare at us.

References

Ashton-Warner, S. (1963). Teacher. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Kidder, T. (1989). Among schoolchildren. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Paley, V. G. (1981). Wally’s stories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Paley, V. G. (1986). Mollie is three: Growing up in school. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Paley, V. G. (1992). You can’t say you can’t play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

John Graney
Indiana State University
<aafgrane@amber.indstate.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-3-]

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.