• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Pronunciation Power: A CD-Rom

November 1999 — Volume 4, Number 2

Pronunciation Power: A CD-Rom

NYPORT Corporation (Michael S. Paas)
551 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10017, USA
Phone: (212) 973-0065; Fax : (212) 973-0070
e-mail:nyport2@hotmail.com
Price:

Units Purchased   Price per Unit
1-10 $50 + s/h
11-50 $46 + s/h
51-100 $42 + s/h
100+ $40 + s/h

System requirements:

Windows:

  • MPC2 compliant.
  • 486/66 MHz or greater processor.
  • Minimum 12MB RAM (Win 95), Minimum MB RAM (Win 3.11)
  • SVGA graphics card with compatible monitor.
  • Minimum double speed CD-ROM drive.
  • SoundBlaster compatible sound card.
  • High-quality microphone.
  • Speakers.
  • 5 MB of available disk space.

Macintosh:

  • Macintosh 40 MHz 68040 or better, or any Power Macintosh.
  • System 7 or higher.
  • 6 MB of free RAM; 640×480 resolution display.
  • Minimum double speed CD-ROM drive.
  • High-quality microphone.
  • Speakers.
  • 5 MB or available disk space.

Pronunciation Power is a multimedia program aiming to teach American pronunciation. It starts with a display of four buttons: (1) User Manual, (2) Quick Tour, (3) Start, and (4) Quit. The User Manual requires the installation of the Acrobat Reader program.

The Quick Tour gives a demonstration of the program. The Start button enables the user to see the transcription of 52 sounds (in five screens). Selecting a sound also means hearing it at the same time, so the user can simply click and hear the sound as many times as he or she wants. Throughout the program, the target sounds in all written exercises can be highlighted with a click on the toggle button. This enables the user to pay attention to the many possibilities of spelling for some of the sounds. Once a sound is selected, four buttons appear: (1) Lessons, (2) Speech Analysis, (3) Exercises, and (4) Quit. Clicking the Lessons button opens a screen with an illustrated, animated side view of the voice box and air flow of the particular sound, and a videotaped front view of the corresponding lip movement. A written (and audible) explanation of the sound production is given as well.

The Speech Analysis button enables the student to hear and record his or her own production of the sound and to compare his or her sound-wave forms to those of the target sound. The student can also hear the target sound and his or her own recording as many times as necessary and compare the two. Thus, the comparison is, in fact, audio-visual. The Exercises button opens a screen with four types of exercises:

  1. Sample Words, consisting of words with the target sound which can be read, heard and recorded, enabling a comparison between target and production.

  2. Comparative Words is an exercise in which words with the target sound are compared to similar words (words with the same consonants but different vowels). These comparative words can also be heard and recorded to enable comparison between target and production.

  3. Listening Discrimination shows sentences which can be both read and heard, with two options for one of the words in each sentence. Both options are semantically and syntactically correct, but only one of the two is the one that is heard. The student has to choose what he or she heard. The program gives feedback with conventional “correct” or “wrong” symbols.

  4. Sentences can be both read and heard and include several words with the target sound. The learner can repeat these sentences, record and then compare his or her production to the model.

Advantages of the program

  • The program is interesting and motivating, aesthetic to the eye, varied, and seems to try to teach what it is supposed to teach. It is user-friendly and does not take too much computer memory.
  • It covers both perceptive and productive aspects of pronunciation, i.e. discrimination (one quarter of the exercises), and production (three quarters).
  • It enables every type of student, even those shy ones who are afraid to speak in front of their peers, to practice on their own, at home, at their own pace, and learn correct pronunciation without the threat of mockery, teachers’ negative reaction, grades, etc.
  • It caters for constant comparisons between the model and the student’s production.
  • It gives spelling variations for each sound, so that the student can learn the sound-symbol possible variations. For example, the sound /i/ is represented by e (England), u (busy), y (typical), ui (build) and o (women).

Disadvantages of the program

  • Some of the comparative words seem to be irrelevant or too easy. For example, the comparison between “fill” and “feel” is fine, because a possible confusion between the long (tense) /I/ and the short (lax) /i/ sounds is common among speakers of languages that do not make this distinction. However, some pairs, including hit/height, rid/raid seem out of place. Hit/heat and rid/read would seem to be more appropriate than “height” and “raid,” respectively. The same criticism applies to many items in the discrimination exercises. The pairs give/gave, case/kiss, hit/hate and grin/grain do not seem to be appropriate because the distinction between the sounds in each pair is too obvious. A possible reason behind these pairs is perhaps the authors’ wish to put two words that would both fit the same context, to prevent the student from figuring out the correct word through reading (as is explained in the manual). However, the result is an exercise that is too easy, so it misses its purpose.
  • There is not enough practice altogether to make the learning effective enough. The sample words exercise offers only 15 items per sound. The comparative words exercise has only 10 pairs. The listening discrimination exercise gives 15 sentences and the sentences exercise gives only 10 sentences. It seems that in order to improve pronunciation, one would need to be exposed to many more examples and do many more exercises. The whole program offers 20 hours of work, as the manual tells us. That is not enough to change pronunciation. In addition, the course offers only pronunciation. It does not offer stress or intonation exercises. In order to be a better speaker of a foreign language, one has to improve these two components of oral expression as well.

Summary

In spite of the above points of criticism, Pronunciation Power seems to be a good start for a learner of English who is willing to improve his or her pronunciationin the language. Still, one should be aware of the fact that this course is only a beginning, and should be followed by much more practice through a more advanced pronunciation course, or a course that offers many more examples and opportunities for practicing stress and intonation.

Shira Koren
Bar Ilan University, Israel
<korens@mail.biu.ac.il>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.