• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Electronic Literacies: Language, Culture, and Power in Online Education

November 1999 — Volume 4, Number 2

Electronic Literacies: Language, Culture, and Power in Online Education

Mark Warschauer (1999)
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Pp. iii + 220
ISBN 0-8058-3119-3 (paper)
US $22.50

Introduction

Electronic Literacies: Language, Culture, and Power in Online Education is a book that investigates the uses of the Internet and other educational technologies in four language and writing classes: an undergraduate English as a second language (ESL) writing class at a small Christian college, a graduate ESL writing class at a large university, an undergraduate intensive Hawai’ian language class at the same university, and an English writing class at a community college.

Mark Warschauer, the author of this book, is an educational technology specialist at America-Mideast Educational and Training Services in Cairo, Egypt. He has taught graduate courses at the university of Hawai’i, Manoa. His research interests include technology in language education. Electronic Literacies is based on his doctoral dissertation at the University of Hawai’i, and reports on a two-year ethnographic study of the uses of the Internet and its role in the development of the language and literacy of linguistically and culturally diverse students.

Description

The book consists of six chapters, an epilogue, and an appendix that has additional notes on the ethnographic approach and methods that Warschauer used for researching the online classroom. The first chapter, “Introduction: Surveying the Terrain of Literacy,” provides an historical perspective on how technologies available for reading and writing, along with other economic, cultural, and political factors, affect people’s experiences and thinking about literacy. It also discusses three contentious issues: a) the nature of electronic literacy, b) electronic literacies and school reform, and c) electronic literacy and inequality. [-1-]

The second chapter, “Computers, Composition, and Christianity,” describes the use of technology in an undergraduate ESL writing class that Warschauer researched at a small Christian college on the island of O’ahu. To understand teaching and learning practices observed in this class, he examined four aspects of the social context of learning: a) the church and college, b) the English language program, c) the teacher’s background and beliefs, and d) the triangular relationship that developed among teacher, researcher, and students.

Chapter 3, “Networking into Academic Discourse,” discusses the integration of technology into a noncredit writing course for international graduate students in the English language program at the University of Hawai’i. This course was a supplemental class for foreign students who had been admitted to the university but needed extra help with their English language proficiency. The students met in a networked computer laboratory twice a week to practice using online tools such as electronic mail, the World Wide Web, and a program for real-time chatting called Daedalus Interchange.

Chapter 4, “Computer-assisted Language Revitalization,” looks at a general Hawai’ian language class using the Daedalus Interchange software. Every week the teacher posted questions or topics for discussion. After several weeks, the students practiced their Hawai’ian by e-mailing students from another school. Near the end of the semester, they did a research paper using Internet resources and published it on the Web.

In chapter 5, “Cyber Service Learning,” the researcher reports on uses of the Internet in a service learning class for working students from diverse backgrounds. The students collaboratively used the Daedalus Interchange program at the beginning of the course; in the second part of the course they wrote service learning publications including World Wide Web pages for community organizations.

In chapter 6, “Conclusion: Striving Toward Multiliteracies,” Warschauer returns briefly to the interrelation among new electronic literacies, school reform, and the impact of the Internet on quality. He concludes that students of diverse linguistic, cultural, and class backgrounds need more than the Internet. They need to have knowledge of the pragmatic use of language and the discourse of power. They need to learn how to solve problems collaboratively with their classmates and with other students from different schools. They also need to read, write, and think about social and cultural issues and how they relate to their lives. These opportunities would help them establish a voice in society.

The epilogue shows the development of the teachers of the four classes after the semester in which Warschauer worked with them. An appendix describes the methodology of the study.

Evaluation

The technique used for collecting data is especially inspirational for researchers. Warschauer entered most of the classes as a co-teacher or a helper rather than merely an outside researcher. To be able to understand the students and their cultures, he also played the role of a learner in the Hawai’ian course. He explains: “I believe my role as a learner in the class contributed positively to the study in two important ways, it gave me insights into the issues I was investigating from a learner’s perspective, and it facilitated my contact with the other students, as I was able to interact fully with them on a daily basis” (p. 90). These multiple roles as teacher-researcher-student enabled him to construct convincing results. [-2-]

The book is well written, without too much reliance on technical jargon, and easy to read. The title reflects its content well, and the design of the cover catches the reader’s attention. It is a well-organized book, except for one minor point: putting the description of the study at the end in an appendix. It may be that Warschauer included it at the end of the book as a supplement because he was concerned that discussions of research methodology would interrupt the succession of the chapters of the book. However, placing the approach and methods of the study at the beginning of the book would have given readers a clearer idea of how the information was gathered before they read the core chapters.

Electronic Literacies is a timely book filled with important ethnographic data on technology and language education, including interviews with students and teachers, observation of classrooms, and transcripts of students’ online interactions. It is one of the few attempts to explore the role of the Internet in the development of the language and literacy of minority students, who have typically been overlooked in Internet-based education. The methodology used in this study can be applied to other groups of students in other contexts.

This text is an excellent resource for teachers and administrators interested in understanding the effects of new technologies on language teaching and learning. Through this understanding, they can promote the use of technology in their classrooms. Overall, the book is a valuable new addition to the field of technology and language teaching and learning.

Saad AlKahtani
Indiana University of Pennsylvania
<fmpg@grove.iup.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-3-]

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.