• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice

November 1999 — Volume 4, Number 2

Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice

Dana Ferris and John S. Hedgcock (1998)
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Pp. xviii + 329
ISBN 0-8058-2450-2 (paper)
US $29.95

How do I design a writing course for college-level non-native speakers? How do I make sure that my syllabus includes all of the important elements? What about assessment? How do I structure peer review sessions? How can I design reading journal assignments? These were a few of my questions as I started planning a writing course for the first time. Teaching ESL Composition was an indispensable, practical handbook for designing handouts, structuring revision sequences, and planning for portfolio assessment.

This book was designed to serve a wide audience of educators and researchers. The authors hope that the book will serve as a textbook for graduate students in TESOL programs, as a handbook for in-service ESL teachers, as a resource for mainstream teachers who want to know more about teaching ESL composition, and as a literature review for researchers in second language (L2) and ESL composition issues. Researchers will find the references to the research literature very concise. Although the reviews do not go into any great depth, they are excellent starting points for researchers embarking on their own literature reviews.

Each chapter begins with a review of the major literature. Chapter 1 is primarily devoted to quickly reviewing some key issues in ESL and L2 writing. It focuses on theoretical and practical issues and provides a brief history of the major trends in ESL and L2 composition. Each of the following chapters deals with a core issue in writing instruction: syllabus design, materials selection, teacher feedback and peer response, grammar and editing, assessment, and computer technology. The authors review theoretical issues for each chapter first, then launch into practical issues. Charts and figures offer concrete examples that can be modified to suit specific needs. Reflection questions and application activities at the end of each chapter are directed at teachers and student teachers. For instance, a very detailed activity on pages 19-20 guides students through the process of making an introspective analysis of their writing process: keeping a chronological log and frankly assessing their strengths and weaknesses. The suggested activities can be used in TESOL methods courses as class assignments or as stimuli for generating research questions. I have used many of these activities and suggestions to guide my work as I develop essay assignments for my course.

Chapters 2 to 4 address the issues facing every teacher who is designing a course, all the while giving special attention to meeting the needs of ESL writers. Chapter 2 reviews research on the reading-writing connection and presents suggestions for designing reading journal assignments and sample intensive reading activities. Chapter 3 covers practical issues in syllabus design and lesson planning, including the steps for conducting a needs analysis, planning the sequence of a course, and setting up steps for the drafting process. The application activities invite teachers to assess a syllabus or design a lesson plan. Chapter 4, “Text Selection, Materials, Task Construction,” deals with choosing course texts, and provides a very detailed checklist of evaluation criteria on pages 90-91. Other checklists aid in the selection of authentic materials and the design of a writing prompt. [-1-]

The remaining chapters look at important issues of feedback and assessment, with a final chapter on using computer technology in the writing classroom. Chapter 5, “Issues in Oral and Written Feedback,” covers written comments and teacher-student writing conferences. The appendixes provide examples of written feedback on student essays, then present a procedure for analyzing and coding written comments. The application activities for chapter 6, “Principles of Peer Response,” offer steps for designing peer response forms and developing a peer response activity that is specific to the writing assignment. Some sample peer response forms are also provided. Chapter 7 focuses on grammar and editing, and offers practical suggestions for assessing student needs and teaching editing skills. The error analysis form on page 215 can be adapted to help students identify major patterns in their errors. Chapter 8, “ESL Writing Assessment,” has sample rubric and essay scoring forms. A section on portfolios addresses some common concerns, and a final section addresses the practical issues of managing the workload and assigning course grades. Chapter 9, “Technology in the Writing Class,” deals with the perennial issues of using spell checkers and grammar analysis programs. The effects of computer use on revision are also carefully discussed.

Having covered the contents of the book and its strengths, I will now turn to some of its weaknesses. Teaching ESL Composition was designed for comprehensiveness, combining research insights with concrete examples of course design. As a handbook for developing activities, it has been well developed. However, it does risk sounding bland and vague by attempting to serve such a broad audience of teachers and researchers. In the interest of this comprehensiveness, the authors seem to have deliberately avoided politically sensitive issues of ESL, such as choice of content. No attention is given to critical theory or critical language studies, for instance. What students will write about is neglected in favor of how they will learn to write. Teachers looking for help in determining the content of their courses will have to look elsewhere.

I would recommend this book as a reference for teachers, as a handbook for planning an in-depth literature review, and as a resource for TESOL methods courses. Having this book on the shelf gives me access to practical models for planning and implementing an ESL writing course. It’s like having a reference library of the best work of several experienced teachers at my disposal.

Beth Lewis Samuelson
College Writing Programs University of California, Berkeley
<btlewis@uclink4.berkeley.edu >

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-2-]

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.