• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Second Language Learning Data Analysis (2nd ed.)

November 1999 — Volume 4, Number 2

Second Language Learning Data Analysis (2nd ed.)

Susan Gass, Antonella Sorace, & Larry Selinker (1999)
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Pp. x + 126
ISBN 0-8058-3263-7
US$22.50 (manual & tapes free upon adoption)

First, a bit of history: this book is actually the third incarnation of a 1984 workbook by Susan Gass and Larry Selinker originally called Workbook in Second Language Acquisition. This book was then redone in 1994 and reissued as Second Language Learning Data Analysis. This new edition is basically the same as the previous edition, but it has been shortened and tightened up. For example, data and questions which used to take up 4 pages of text (perhaps so students could write answers in the book?) now take up a snappy 2 pages through reduction in the spaces between items. The appendix, which contained some extended transcripts, has also gotten the ax.

Second Language Learning Data Analysis is designed as a workbook (even if it is no longer called as such!) of supplementary exercises for university classes in Second Language Acquisition (SLA), and in this function it excels. The strength of the book is that it offers practice in a wide range of data gathering instruments and research focuses, so that the book is not tied to any one approach to investigating SLA. Besides raw non-native speaker (NNS) data and acceptability judgements, it includes activities with sentence combination tasks, NNS’s comments on their own production, a word association task, longitudinal interview data, and a whole range of language production tasks such as production of stimulus sounds, describing shapes, and NNS telephone surveys. The other nice thing about the book is that it aims to familiarize students with various research instruments, and also helps them to begin to think like SLA researchers. The task questions often have the students ponder why the data is as it is, rather than seeking a right answer. There are also tasks examining why some data-gathering instruments are not very good for certain purposes. For example, in activity 1.3 students are confronted with the problem of how far you can trust informants’ claims on how much they understand. Activity 6.2 shows how the linguistic input that the NNS gets can influence the interlanguage data they produce. Furthermore, the activites are not limited to the usual studies of NNS’s lexicons, morphology, and syntax, but also focus on linguistic questions of semantics, phonology, language variation, and communication strategies. Finally, while most of the exercises examine the acquisition of English as a second language (by people with quite a variety of first languages), there are many activities that use a variety of other languages (e.g., Dutch, French, Italian, Chinese), so the book can be used for classes that do not focus on ESL teaching. There is also a cassette tape which is needed for several of the exercises; however, I did not have access to the tape so I can say nothing of its value. [-1-]

What the book really needs is a table of contents or other tables to clearly show how it is organized and what kinds of activities are where. For example, take the first section, Research Methodology. Its first activity is called Acceptability Judgements–so far so good. The next task, however, is Relative Nouns; personally, I can’t figure out how relative nouns can be conceived of as a research methodology. The third activity in this section is not any better: Misunderstanding 1 (there is no Misunderstanding 2). Although the labels for the other six sections seem clear (Lexicon, Syntax & Semantics, Phonology, Variation, Oral Language, and Communication Strategies), it is not clear why the activities are presented in this order or why these categories were chosen. Some activities seem to teach about problems in researching SLA while others concentrate on research methodology, and there is no table separating these two categories. If you only want to look at activities with a certain type of task, such as acceptability judgements, you have to go through the whole book activity by activity.

That said, each activity begins with a nice summary of relevant information, such as native language of participants, target language, data source, learner information, and so forth. There is a teacher’s manual, available (with the tapes) free of charge when the book is adopted for use in a course. Without the manual, you will have to figure out the point (or points) of each exercise yourself!

Despite these shortcomings, this book can be a very valuable supplement to most any SLA class. What about for teachers? I can imagine that some of you out there are thinking, “Hey Nat, this journal is primarily for teachers! Would you recommend this book for teachers, either alone or in study groups, who want to learn about studying SLA in their own classrooms?” The answer is an emphatic “NO!” (Was that loud and clear enough?) First of all, there is no way to check your answers without having to run to some SLA person. I’m not saying you have to be an Einstein to do the tasks in the book, but beginners need more guidance than this book offers. Moreover, the organizational problems, mentioned above, would even further confuse novices to this field. In addition, this book only covers one particular slice of the whole research process. While the book does deal with various problems in researching SLA, it does not provide a complete framework for researching SLA. Not only are there no comments on why a particular data gathering and/or analysis method was used to research a particular question, there is often no mention of the actual research question. Finally, the kind of research these activities are designed for is looking for generalities in language and language learning. While some teachers may be interested in investigating these kinds of questions, my experience is that language teachers are interested in the peculiarities of the language and language learning of their students, and that is not something this book places an emphasis on. Where this book might be useful is for a teacher or group of teachers who already have a solid background in academic SLA and SLA research, and are looking for examples of different kinds of data gathering tools. [-2-]

Second Language Learning Data Analysis (2nd ed.) fills a need in the SLA text book world–inhabited primarily by summaries of research or research guidelines–by providing a rich variety of second language data where students can get their hands dirty in SLA analysis. While this is an excellent supplemental resource for an experienced linguist teaching SLA, it is not suitable for beginners learning on their own, and probably was not written for this purpose..

Nat Bartels
Zentrum für Kognitionswissenschaften, Universität Leipzig
<bartels@data.ntz.uni-leipzig.de>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-3-]

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.