• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Under the Lens: A Look at the American Media

Vol. 4. No. 3 — May 2000

Under the Lens: A Look at the American Media

Carol Keiser Bishop (1997)
Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press
Pp. xx + 165
ISBN 0-472-08403-8 (paper)
US $16.95

Teacher’s Manual

Pp. 125
ISBN 0-472-08429-1 (paper)
US $15.95

Purpose


Under the Lens: A Look at the American Media is part of The University of Michigan Press Alliance series of textbooks for theme-based content instruction [
1]. There are three levels in this series; Under the Lens is directed at advanced-level ESL/EFL students. Like all content-based instruction (CBI) materials, this textbook aims to help students improve their language competency while learning a particular subject matter. Under the Lens helps students to “discover how the American media really works and understand its influence on American society” (back cover). Growing interest in so-called “media literacy” makes this book a timely addition to the language teacher’s bookshelf, in that aspects of the American mass media (newspapers, newsmagazines, radio and television) are explored. An ESL/EFL teacher in Canada and the United States has ready access to all these forms of media; indeed, those of us living north of the 49th parallel receive much of our information from the major American news broadcasters. ABC, NBC, CBS, and CNN, among others, are easily available through cable television providers. The advent of the satellite dish admits even more channels into our home. [-1-] Here in Montreal, I can readily buy any of the major American newspapers the day they are published in the United States. American newsmagazines (not to mention entertainment magazines) dominate the shelves of my local gas station-grocery store. Teachers in other parts of the world can also have access to these media; on a recent trip to the Middle East, I was able to watch the Today Show on NBC’s Star Channel, broadcast around the world. And needless to say, with the ubiquity of the Internet, anyone with a service provider anywhere in the world can access forms of American media online.

Students at the advanced levels are more than willing to explore topics that may generate controversy and difference of opinion. They demonstrate competency in basic and intermediate grammar structures, and are prepared to tackle more complex reading and writing assignments. Under the Lens provides such students with content that challenges them not only linguistically, but also intellectually.

Content

Under the Lens is primarily a reading comprehension and writing activity textbook, although there are many activities that are designed for conversation. The overall language objectives, however, are aimed at critical thinking, reading, and writing skills. An example of language objectives from one of the later chapters emphasises this focus: “Comprehending academic text; applying textual information to a task; reading and interpreting graphs; scanning for specific information; reading critically,” and so on (TM, p. 82). The six chapters of Under the Lens examine communication and media, societal expectations of the media, what news is, and three forms of media (newspapers, radio, and television). The opening chapters introduce the students to some of the basic concepts in communication theory through activities which include discussions, filling in charts, reading newspaper and magazine articles, as well as academic selections adapted from textbooks in the field, grammar practice, and listening to lectures on the topic. The chapters which examine specific media include readings on the history of newspaper, radio, and television, as well as copious and varied exercises for the students: reading and outlining, listening, group discussion, examining various types of charts, vocabulary practice, and so on.

Organization

Different types of activities open the chapters, in order to draw the students into the topic. For example, students are asked to choose their favorite form of media (from among newspaper, radio, and television), to do a listening comprehension exercise, or to listen to a recording of various radio programming. Unfortunately, since I didn’t have access to the cassette tapes, I cannot comment on the quality or pertinence of their selections. With the exception of the first chapter, all chapters include a section titled “A Look Behind/A Look Ahead,” which reviews what the students have already learned and outlines the goals of the chapter. Students are also invited to assess their achievement in reaching a number of listed objectives. Content objectives are listed in the student books, “while teachers are provided with both content and language objectives in the teacher’s manual” (p. vi). As described above, many activities follow, more it seems than can be covered in one three-hour class; the teacher may have to pick and choose, or assign the reading exercises for homework. The chapters end with a journal entry assignment.[-2-]

Teacher’s Manual

Using a content-based approach in teaching language can be a challenge for teachers, because they may not have the necessary background in the subject matter. The teacher’s manual explains that the teacher “need not have knowledge of the discipline,” and that “this book should give you all the information that you need” (TM, p. 1). As all of us have had close contact with radio, television, and newspapers, the recommended background reading in communications (“a basic freshman-level communications text is a good place to start” [TM, p. 2]) should not be too arduous. And primary material is readily available, although the author reminds us that these materials are protected by copyright. The teacher’s manual mirrors the student book and gives the background and techniques necessary to carry out the activities successfully in class, the answers to exercises (where applicable), and the tapescripts.

Evaluation

I assume that most teachers use newspaper and magazine clippings regularly in class; many anthologies of radio and television segments exist with permission for broadcast in class (I think of the Prentice-Hall Focus On series of videos, or the excellent collection of Garrison Keillor’s radio broadcasts). PBS also serves as an excellent source of material, and many of its programs permit off-air taping (see http://www.pbs.org). With the vast array of material available, Under the Lens helps both the teacher and the student make sense of the organizational, intellectual and linguistic challenges of the subject. While the text would be useful for any advanced-level course, it would be particularly relevant for an English for Special Purposes (ESP) classroom, such as the teaching of reading to students in communications and other social sciences. [-3-]

Having reviewed two of the books in this series, I feel confident that the others as well live up to the high quality shown here.

End Note

[1] Reviews of three other books in this series were published in TESL-EJ 2(4) and 3(3):

Varieties of English (Gass & Lefkowitz, 1995):
http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej08/r2.html

Ecology and the Environment (Tickle, 1996):
http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej08/r5.html

Discovering American Culture (Delk, 1997):
http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej11/r2.html

Sorel Friedman
Université de Montréal
<sorel.friedman@umontreal.ca>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation..

[-4-]

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.