• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Western/Pacific Literacy Network/CNN SF Learning Resources

September 2002 — Volume 6, Number 2

Western/Pacific Literacy Network/CNN SF Learning Resources

Title: Western/Pacific Literacy Network/CNN SF Learning Resources
URL: http://literacynet.org/cnnsf/home.html
Contact: Paul Heavenridge
Director
Western/Pacific Literacy Network
1086 Eighth Street
Oakland, CA 94607-2697
PHONE: (510) 834-0735 & 834-7835
FAX: (510) 832-5021
Email: pheaven@literacynet.org
Type of product: Online reading, listening/viewing materials based on CNN stories

Minimum hardware requirements: Sound card necessary to take advantage of the site’s audio aspect
Price: Free

Objectives

The Western/Pacific Literacy Network/CNN SF Learning Resources website is a gold mine. The author states the objectives prominently on the homepage: “. . . to develop an online literacy site that benefits all English learners and instructors. This material is intended for adult literacy and educational purposes. Though the intended audience is adults, instructors and learners (of all ages) are encouraged to use the material to promote better literacy.” To this end the website offers modules which provide interactive reading and listening/viewing comprehension activities, based on current and past CNN San Francisco bureau news stories.

Although journalism is usually regarded as a discipline separate from the English curriculum, it has much to offer English teachers. Dvorak (1985) provides rationales for journalism’s role in the English curriculum. He notes that journalism fulfills several crucial elements in English programs when he sums up:

It has relevance; it has built-in objectives; it is transactional; it applies various liberal arts theories learned in other disciplines; it invites high level decision-making; it brings to life the need for the study of English grammar, usage, spelling, style, syntax; and it can be one of the most rewarding language arts experiences a student can have at school.

The website presents a rationale and techniques not so much for studying journalism in the English classroom, but for using journalism as a means to teach or learn English on the web. [-1-]

The Website’s Domain

  1. Different Text Versions of the Same Material
  2. The material provided for teaching/learning is comprised of independent news stories which cover a wide range of topics, such as adventure, environment, business and economy, health, crime, politics, culture and society, religion, science and technology, and education. All the materials are adapted from news stories by CNN San Francisco reporters. Each story is thoughtfully and usefully dealt with in three versions–the original story, an abridged version of the story, and an outline of the story. The original versions of the stories are intended for adults with moderate reading and speaking comprehension skills, including advanced ESL or non-native English speakers. The abridged stories are modifications of the original story made by simplifying complex ideas, vocabulary and sentences. These are intended for adults with low reading comprehension skills including beginning ESL or non-native English speakers. The story outline is a summary of the basic elements of the story.

    The different versions described above allow users flexibility in determining the cognitive load and time required. Allowing teachers and learners to control the level of difficulty and presentation of the readings helps to arouse interest and improve intrinsic motivation.

  3. Comprehension Activities & Interactive Feedback
  4. The site is designed to interactively test learners’ comprehension of the stories using activities divided into sections: Word Selection, Multiple Choice, Vocabulary, Sequencing, Conclusions, and Your Turn.

    There are clear directions and methods for measuring comprehension on the basis of the above activities. After answering a question, learners can get instant feedback by clicking the choice button for each question. The positive and negative feedback visuals are so loveably attractive that learners will not be discouraged when they make many mistakes. At the bottom, there are convenient navigation buttons for viewing content, the next question, and the previous questions. These activities emphasize developing literacy and problem solving rather than dealing with any profound issues raised in the stories, in keeping with the needs and objectives stated in the site’s rationale.

    The “Your Turn!” activities were one of my favorite features. These activities allow learners to respond to a question concerning the story they have just read. Learners’ comments are collected and posted on the “Your Turn!” page. Learners are encouraged to respond to other learners’ comments. The activity is certainly productive in encouraging creative writing and in using writing as a learning tool.[-2-]

  5. Multimedia Integration
  6. Along with the texts, most story modules contain one or more of the following multimedia formats:

    • Full streaming video of the broadcast
    • Full streaming audio of the broadcast
    • Text of the story read by Greg Lefevre, CNN SF Bureau Chief
    • AVI video clips
    • Quicktime video clips

    These features definitely enhance the website’s content. The learner can not only read and write but also listen to and view the material. This is very important for ESL/EFL students who are practicing listening comprehension. The author has made best use of modern technology to perfect the site in accordance with its objectives.

  1. Useful External Links
  2. From a domain point of view, the external links embedded in the pages are quite appropriate and of high quality. They expanded the scope of learning from language to other topics in related fields. The expanded topics are of course in English and enrich the learner’s knowledge. For example, on the site there is a story entitled “Ringling Brothers Trainer on Trial for Animal Abuse.” Not only is a definition of “abuse” provided at the bottom, but other resources in hypertext also add further references related to the word. Moreover, learners can keep track of new developments in the story by clicking linked titles such as “Mark Gebel was found innocent of the charges.” Even further, the author provides links to items related to the general topic, such as Asian elephant conservation and the World Wildlife Fund, to allow learners to acquire more knowledge.

Use of Technology

  1. Connectivity
  2. As there are few graphics or logos embedded in the pages of the website, access to all elements in the page is quick and easy. There are no special browser or software requirements to use the site’s elements. Of course a sound card is necessary to listen to the multimedia clips–which are also easily and quickly downloaded by clicking the corresponding icons. [-3-]

  3. Interface-related Aspects
  4. The layout and design of the website is excellent. As soon as it is accessed, the site structure and contents are clearly shown. The non-intrusive background color aesthetically matches the size and color of fonts and pictures. The pages are not overloaded and there is a nice balance between text and graphics. It is very easy to navigate through the website as there is a navigation bar on the left. Well-placed navigation buttons allow the user to view and switch conveniently and quickly in all pages. The information flows very logically from one page to another, and since the related links are all in one page, the user is tempted to go further after browsing the story. There is a word search function always available at the bottom of the navigating frame. This makes it very convenient to look up a word at any time. Links on the site work well and no orphan pages were found. The site does not employ distracting animation or other audio, video, or javascript effects except for the learning materials. It does not include any advertising banners or sponsor windows. This makes the site user-friendly and highly intuitive in its design and methodology. It embodies the style and features of an educational site.

  5. Interactivity
  6. The site is good but could be better in the realm of interactivity. In addition to the points where the comprehension activities are produced interactively, the “Feedback” section welcomes comments. The learner may use the form to send the author his/her ideas, views, corrections, and critiques. The “My Comment” field in the page is a drop down menu for category selection. Besides the “Your Turn!” section, the site could have provided a customized forum, message board, mailing list, or chat room to facilitate in-depth discussion so that users would have more opportunities to interact with each other.

  7. Detailed and Clear Help Documentation and Instruction
  8. The help documentation and instructions provided are comprehensive and complete. They are clearly laid out with visual aids and text. A brief note on how to perform the comprehension activity allows users to start the program quickly. The detailed and clear information on accessing various screens is orderly arranged so that learners can locate them in no time. The author offers clear instructions on how, where and why to download plug-ins which can extend the capabilities of web browsers and make the most of the learning program. Furthermore, all of the suggested software can be downloaded for free from famous companies.

Overall, the website contains original content in a wide range of areas. Each topic is useful, rich, and complete. The website offers educational value and certainly is an adaptable and motivating language program. It is also pedagogically sound and could be merged smoothly into ESL/EFL teaching plans, or could be used as a learning supplement.

Summary

The CNN San Francisco bureau and the Western/Pacific Literacy Network (Western/Pacific LINCS) have partnered to develop an excellent website for English language learners and teachers. The site is regularly updated to add more topics and categories. The design and interface are simple but excellent. The content is given more attention than design. In a word, it is of high educational value. Considering the notion that an educational site should be easy to use so as to facilitate students’ learning through technology rather than learning the technology itself, this site, due to its ease of use and excellent content, is a great choice for teachers to incorporate into an ESL/EFL curriculum, or for students to use as a valuable supplement in the lab or at home.

References

Dvorak, Jack. (1985). Journalism’s Role in the Secondary School Language Arts Curriculum in the Context of the Educational Reform Movement. Paper presented at the Mid-Winter meeting of the Secondary Education Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Guo Shesen
Luoyang University, P.R. China

<guoshesen@21cn.com>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-4-]

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.