• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Tapestry: Reading 1

September 2002 — Volume 6, Number 2

Tapestry: Reading 1

Rebecca Oxford (Series Editor) and M.E. Sokolik (Reading Editor) (2000)
Boston: Heinle & Heinle
Pp. xiii + 198
ISBN 083840568-1 (paper)

Tapestry: Reading 2

Rebecca Oxford (Series Editor) and M.E. Sokolik (Reading Editor) (2000)
Boston: Heinle & Heinle
Pp. xiii + 203
ISBN 083840056-6 (paper)

Tapestry: Reading 3

Rebecca Oxford (Series Editor) and M.E. Sokolik (Reading Editor) (2000)
Boston: Heinle & Heinle
Pp. xiii + 235
ISBN 083840050-7 (paper)

Tapestry: Reading 4

Rebecca Oxford (Series Editor) and M.E. Sokolik (Reading Editor) (2000)
Boston: Heinle & Heinle
Pp. xiii + 221
ISBN 083840060-4 (paper)

Introduction and Description of Organization

I have been using the Tapestry Series with my ESL students in college-level academic reading classes here in the United States. It has taken me some time to find a series that addresses many of these students’ specific needs as they transition from the ESL academic courses to other academic classes. Tapestry includes a range of activities and exercises that focus on building reading skills and also includes several supplemental resources. Tapestry 1,2, 3, and4 are very good texts to use in a reading program and in general, have few weaknesses. The books provide a variety of readings, and also include sections on language learning strategies and study skills, as well as resources such as CNN video clips, and language learning web sites.

The books cover a range of themes including topics such as College Life, Healthy Habits, Love and Marriage, Space is the Place, Jobs and Occupations, Lawmakers and Lawbreakers, Beyond Science, Cultural Perspectives, The Gender-Role Revolution, Media and Culture, Affluenza, On the Move: Population and Immigration, Saving the Planet: Ecology, and so forth.

Reading Skills Covered

These topics are used to present reading skills and strategies used before, during, and after reading. The topics themselves are not identified as separate skills as in many reading textbooks, however, the activities and questions are designed so that students have opportunities to practice several skills. Many chapters begin with questions to activate schemata and prior knowledge. Vocabulary practice is provided through fill-in-the-blank exercises and content knowledge and comprehension can be assessed and practiced through the comprehension questions and matching exercises which often follow the readings. The exercises provide practice in pre-reading skills such as scanning and skimming, and activation of schemata, and the vocabulary fill-in exercises provide practice in use of context as a reading skill. The comprehension questions and true/false questions focus on overall understanding of the text and main idea recognition. The Language Learning Strategy sections provide some information and further practice in the application of reading skills and strategies. [-1-]

Unit Organization and Features of the Text

The units are arranged slightly differently but each unit generally begins with some type of pre-reading activity usually indicated by the heading Getting Ready to Read. It might be a matching activity, true-false exercise, or questions related to the reading. Following this is an introduction to new vocabulary, Vocabulary Check, which is a list of some of the words, which appear in the reading to follow. A reading, typically an article of some type is presented and then that is proceeded by the section After You Read which contains the comprehension questions. Vocabulary Building exercises containing many of the same words as the “Vocabulary Check” at the beginning of the chapter also follow the reading exercises. Some chapters include a section called Tuning In, which often includes a few questions related to the CNN videos that come accompany each book. The chapters end with a section entitled Putting it all Together, ideas for additional projects which might involve group work or internet research, journal or report writing. Each chapter also includes two sections, Academic Power Strategy, which are descriptions of study strategies students can apply to any academic course and setting. Some of these include setting goals, creating a study schedule, participating in class discussions, communicating with professors, locating and using campus resources, etc. The Language Learning Strategy sections provide some information and further practice in reading skills and strategies which include main idea recognition, topic sentence identification, concept mapping, identifying a writer’s purpose and audience, distinguishing fact and opinion, identifying causes and effects, drawing inferences, evaluating viewpoints, using context clues, etc. Both of these sections are highly useful for students. Heinle and Heinle also has a website with online multiple-choice quizzes for each chapter of the book. http://www.tapestry.heinle.com/ Finally, there is a Test Taking Tip section and Check Your Progress section which requires students to rate themselves in terms of how well they have mastered the goals set at the beginning of each chapter.

Evaluation

The Tapestry Reading books include some excellent features that make the books very user-friendly. The books contain some very good articles on a range of topics to be of interest to students. The chapters follow a similar format so students know what to expect in each chapter. The vocabulary words emphasized in each chapter are commonly words that students at that particular level are not familiar with so the words emphasized are quite appropriate. The Language Learning Strategy sections are particularly useful as they focus on reading skills and strategies that can be applied to the readings.

While I very much like these textbooks and will continue to use them, there are, however, some weaknesses. The books do not offer enough vocabulary practice. Although students are encouraged to find the definitions of the vocabulary words presented in the Vocabulary Check section of the books and are also encouraged to add them to a vocabulary log. Teachers should therefore explain the function and format of a vocabulary log and ensure students are doing so. Vocabulary development, once vocabulary learning strategies are taught, is to a large extent up to the student. Nonetheless one-time exposure to the words is not enough and therefore additional vocabulary practice is needed; teachers must do much more in terms of encouraging the learning of these words. If the books even contained one or two follow-up additional activities with these word lists, it would help to reinforce the words and facilitate learning of the vocabulary.

As stated the Language Learning Strategy sections are extremely useful as each time they focus on a particular reading skill, but teachers must emphasize and model these skills throughout the book so students use and apply these skills and strategies. For example, one chapter might discuss the difference between fact and opinion, use of context clues, or the importance of audience and purpose identification, but teachers will need to re-emphasize and re-visit these strategies throughout the text as students read the various pieces in the texts. Class discussion therefore is essential so that these textual features and aspects are continually discussed and reinforced. The main limitation of the reading series, especially the higher-level books, Books 3 and 4, is that the books do not offer enough actual reading practice in terms of the application of skills. The questions that usually follow the text do not always get at the range of skills or textual features in enough detail. Higher-level cognitive skills such as evaluation, synthesis, and analysis for example are not emphasized to the degree that they should be in an academic reading series. Teachers will have to find ways of getting at those essential reading skills when discussing the articles. [-2-]

Finally, although not a major point, the chapter questions on the website can be improved. The questions are too simplistic and once again do not get at the higher-level cognitive skills essential in an academic course. Online vocabulary quizzes corresponding to each chapter would also be extremely useful and teachers can use them just as the comprehension questions, as students have the option of entering a teacher’s email address so scores are sent to the teacher.

Overall, my students and I do like the Tapestry Reading Books very much because of the easy-to-use format, well-organized structure, and interesting articles and topics. The Final Project suggestions at the end of each chapter also allow for some creativity and offer interesting follow-up activities, often requiring student research, another important skill. I have examined many reading series and so far Tapestry, Books 1-4 have been the most suitable for our reading courses and students’ needs. They do address reading skills in a context, and offer some of the more appropriate and interesting readings and themes, certainly an essential element to keep our readers interested and motivated.

Meena Singhal
Long Beach City College
<msinghal@lbcc.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-3-]

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.