• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Dialogue on Writing: Rethinking ESL, Basic Writing, and First-Year Composition

September 2002 — Volume 6, Number 2

Dialogue on Writing: Rethinking ESL, Basic Writing, and First-Year Composition

Eds. Geraldine DeLuca, Len Fox, Mark-Ameen Johnson and Myra Kogen (2002)
Pp. xvi + 488
ISBN: 0-8058-3861-9 (paper)
Price: US$46.00

DeLuca, Fox, Johnson, and Kogen have brought together engaging articles on teaching writing, becoming a writer, responding to writing, and other issues affecting the lives and work of those teaching writing. Each of these four sections consists of a general introduction by the editors and seven individual articles that include short bibliographies and discussion questions. A handy index completes the book. Dialogue on Writing is intended to be used as a textbook in courses on theories or methods of teaching college writing, but it may also be invaluable for the professional development of instructors of composition. While the anthology does not offer sure-fire solutions to all of the difficulties surrounding writing, it is full of food for thought. In fact, it even is downright therapeutic at times.

Due to the variety of subject matter and striking diversity of the authors and their perspectives, it is impossible to comment on all of the individual contributions. Most of the selections in the first two sections explain various approaches to student-centered, personalized writing. For example, in “Pedagogy of the Distressed,” Jane Tompkins outlines a teaching method to reduce her course preparations and burnout, while increasing student participation and variety in the classroom: let the students do the teaching. In this scenario, the instructor meets with the discussion leaders outside the classroom, guiding them through the teaching process. They are then responsible for introducing the material in class to their peers. I appreciate not only the practical pieces of advice such as this one but also the candid remarks and confessions that the writers make in most of the articles. In Tompkin’s case, she explains her struggle to get past her own guilt of not doing all the teaching herself. As a result, I decided I was able to do so too and reaped the benefits both in the classroom and on a personal level.

Furthermore, the editors are to be praised for selecting nearly jargon-free and inspiring essays ranging from four previously unpublished essays to those have become “classics” in the field of writing, such as Peter Elbow’s “The Process of Writing–Growing.” Elbow’s encouraging prose should be read in every basic composition course. Here an excerpt on editing: “Every word omitted keeps another reader with you. Every word retained saps strength from the others. Think of throwing away not as negative–not as crumpling up sheets of paper in helplessness and rage–but as a positive, creative generative act” (p.155). In a word: breathtaking. Sure masterpieces such as this one can be tracked down elsewhere, but many instructors may not have found it on their own, especially if they didn’t know what to look for or if they, like some EFL instructors I know, do not have access to well-stocked libraries. I stumbled across enough rewarding material to say this anthology is worth its hefty price. Besides it save instructors the hassle of putting together their own packet of information for classes on teaching writing. [-1-]

A number of the entries discuss the challenges of incorporating cultural contexts and multiculturalism into teaching and writing. While viewed from the perspective of African Americans, Vietnam veterans, and others, diversity is seen as an opportunity not as a handicap or a “problem” for the writing classroom. Thus, those interested in how diversity affects the teaching of writing will especially want to consult the a number of the articles in sections one and two.

Section three contains articles on responding to writing in a way that considers individual needs and fosters critical-thinking skills, enabling students to find not only their own mistakes, but also point of view. Of all the sections this one provides the most practical teaching tips. The contributors take up the issue of grammar in the writing classroom and grading procedures. Especially noteworthy in this section is Richard Miller’s contribution entitled, “Fault Lines in the Contact Zone,” in which he tackles the question of dealing with morally questionable writing.

The final section is a potpourri of various topics ranging from the unfair working conditions and salaries for post-secondary teachers of writers to the impact of technology on writing. Take Vivian Zamel’s enlightening essay entitled “Strangers in Academia: The Experiences of Faculty and ESL Students Across the Curriculum,” for example. Zamel outlines the difficulty ESL students have to show their knowledge of English, as the classroom material and testing procedures tend to highlight their deficiencies in English.

If there is one thing to criticize in this excellent anthology, it is the choice to include a previously-published article from 1998 on “new technology” in which among other things writing software is discussed–four years represents a long time in the computer age. At the very least, this essay should have been updated. In addition, I missed a discussion on plagiarism especially in the articles on technology but also in the anthology as well. Plagiarism is an ever-increasing problem in light of the cut-and-paste function in Internet browsers and web sites that sell seminar papers to other students. These minor criticisms aside, I would recommend Dialogue on Writing to those looking for a fresh approach, new ideas, or challenges. This versatile anthology would surely make interesting reading and spark a lively discussion in upper-level teacher-training courses on writing.

Sabrina Voelz
Universitaet Lueneburg, Germany
<voelz@uni-lueneburg.de>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-2-]

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.